Engine Controller Software Reprogramming via Block Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for upgrading engine control software are inefficient and risky, as they often require physical modifications to the engine controller and are not easily reversible, especially due to the presence of multiple software versions and the lack of easily removable and replaceable chips in modern vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for upgrading engine controller software by determining the current software version, identifying and replacing specific data blocks with upgraded software, using a processor and interface to communicate with the engine controller, and storing information about software versions and upgrade blocks, allowing for dynamic reprogramming and verification checks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If physical chip removal and replacement is used to upgrade software, then software can be upgraded, but the engine controller is physically modified and the process becomes irreversible and risky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware upgrade processVSAvoidengine controller integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The software is segmented into modular components that can be individually replaced. The upgrade process replaces only specific software modules or data blocks within the existing software image rather than requiring complete chip replacement, enabling selective updates while maintaining system integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical process of physically removing and replacing chips is substituted with an electronic/software-based reprogramming process. The system uses data manipulation and memory rewriting techniques to upgrade software without any physical intervention, eliminating the risks associated with mechanical chip handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If diagnostic systems are provided for software reprogramming, then software can be updated, but the systems are too expensive for individual car owners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware reprogramming capabilityVSAvoidreprogramming system cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reprogramming system is designed to work through the existing OBDII port that all modern vehicles already possess. By making the system compatible with standard vehicle diagnostics infrastructure, it eliminates the need for expensive proprietary equipment and can be used by anyone with a standard diagnostic connector.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables end-users to perform software upgrades themselves without requiring professional diagnostic equipment or technical expertise. The process is simplified to allow individual car owners to update their own software using readily available tools and the vehicle's built-in communication port.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If complete software replacement is used, then upgraded functionality is achieved, but compatibility with specific engine controller versions cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware upgrade efficiencyVSAvoidsoftware version compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different software modules are tailored to specific engine controller versions and configurations. The system identifies the exact controller variant and applies only the compatible upgrade modules for that specific version, ensuring precise matching between software updates and hardware characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification and verification of the engine controller version before applying any software upgrades. Compatibility checks are conducted in advance to ensure that the selected software modules are appropriate for the specific controller variant, preventing incompatibility issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8458689B2Method and apparatus for reprogramming engine controllers
Publication Date: 2013.06.04 8689 LLC
  • US8458689B2 patent drawing
  • US8458689B2 patent drawing
  • US8458689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to methods and apparatus for altering the software of engine controllers. The method comprises determining a version of the current software in the engine controller, identifying one or more data blocks of upgraded software associated with the current software and replacing portions of the current software with the data blocks of upgraded software. The apparatus comprises an interface, a memory and a processor. The processor is configured to determine the version of the current software in the engine controller and replace one or more data blocks of the current software with one or more data blocks of upgraded software stored in the memory.