Engine Controller Tumble Flow Shape Reversal for Lean Burn Ignition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional controllers for internal combustion engines face challenges in maintaining stable ignition during lean burn operations due to varying gas flow velocities around the sparkplug, especially at low fuel concentrations and high engine rotation speeds, leading to misfire and combustion instability.

Innovation Solution

A controller that adjusts the shape of tumble flow between a first and second tumble shape based on engine rotation speed, altering the gas flow direction and velocity around the sparkplug to maintain optimal ignition conditions, utilizing an electronic control unit to manage the intake and exhaust valves and the tumble flow control valve.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If tumble flow is generated inside the cylinder during lean burn operation, then combustion efficiency is improved, but gas flow velocity around the sparkplug becomes too high or too low making stable ignition difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidignition stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the tumble flow shape changeable during the compression stroke. The electronic control unit dynamically adjusts the tumble flow from a first shape (with single rotation direction) to a second shape (with opposite rotation direction) based on engine rotation speed. This dynamic adjustment allows the gas flow velocity around the sparkplug to be controlled within an appropriate range, maintaining ignition stability while preserving combustion efficiency improvements from tumble flow generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If engine rotation speed increases, then power output is improved, but gas flow velocity around the sparkplug increases making ignition unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidignition stability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by altering the tumble flow shape parameter based on engine rotation speed. When engine rotation speed is high, the electronic control unit changes the tumble flow to the second shape with opposite rotation direction, which reverses the gas flow direction around the sparkplug. This parameter change compensates for the increased gas flow velocity due to higher engine speed, maintaining stable ignition while allowing the engine to operate at high power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If tumble flow shape is changed to control gas flow velocity, then ignition ability is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition abilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using the existing tumble control valve and electronic control unit to achieve multiple functions: maintaining combustion efficiency through tumble flow generation and controlling ignition stability through tumble flow shape change. The same control system infrastructure is utilized for both purposes, avoiding the need for additional dedicated components and minimizing control system complexity while improving ignition ability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures stable ignition by controlling gas flow velocity around the sparkplug within a suitable range for lean burn operations, regardless of engine rotation speed, thereby improving ignition ability and reducing torque fluctuations.

Implementation Method 1

a tumble flow control valve that generates tumble flow inside a cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTumble flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

a sparkplug disposed in the vicinity of a center portion of an upper wall surface of a combustion chamber and serving to ignite an air-fuel mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpark discharge: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 3

the electronic control unit is configured to change a shape of the tumble flow between a first tumble shape and a second tumble shape according to an engine rotation speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex flow control: Vortex Ring

Data Source

PatentUS9976491B2Controller for internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9976491B2 patent drawing
  • US9976491B2 patent drawing
  • US9976491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an internal combustion engine including a sparkplug disposed in the vicinity of the center portion of an upper wall surface of a combustion chamber. Tumble flow generated during lean burn operation is controlled such that the tumble flow shape changes according to the engine rotation speed between a first tumble shape (usual tumble shape) in which the flow direction of a gas around the sparkplug at the time of ignition is direction from an intake valve side toward an exhaust valve side in a latter half of a compression stroke, and a second tumble shape (ω tumble shape) in which the flow direction of the gas is reversed in the latter half of the compression stroke from the direction from the intake valve side toward the exhaust valve side to the direction from the exhaust valve side toward the intake valve side.