Vehicle Engine Cooling Frame Floating Hinge Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle engine cooling module frames face issues with deformation and inefficiency due to flat molding processes, which lead to assembly challenges, material waste, and reduced flap effectiveness, as well as the need for specific molds and presses.

Innovation Solution

A frame design that eliminates the need for specific molds and presses by using pegs to create a floating hinge mechanism, allowing for easier rotation and assembly, with a molding joint plane at the axis of rotation for reinforcement and no joint plane on extensions, enabling smooth surface rotation and control of the flap's opening angle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If flat molding is used to produce the shutter, then the shutter can be manufactured with standard molding processes, but the molding joint plane appears on the extensions causing deformation and reducing rotation effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding processVSAvoidflap flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter is divided into two distinct parts: the closure part and the extensions. The closure part is molded separately and then assembled to the extensions via interference fit with pegs. This segmentation allows the closure part to be molded without creating joint planes on the extensions, eliminating the deformation issue while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The extensions are extracted from the molding process of the closure part. Instead of molding the entire shutter as one piece, the extensions are formed separately and then attached. This extraction removes the source of the molding joint plane problem from the extensions, allowing them to maintain their required flatness and rotation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If the shutter is assembled separately on the frame using clips or hinge pins, then the frame and shutter can be manufactured independently, but the assembly process induces deformation and weakens the shutter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing independenceVSAvoidshutter strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The closure part and extensions are merged into a single integrated shutter component through interference fit assembly. The pegs inserted into the extensions create a strong mechanical connection that combines the two parts into one robust unit, eliminating the need for separate clip or hinge pin assemblies and preventing deformation from multiple assembly steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The extensions are pre-formed with interference fit features (pegs) that are designed to be inserted into the closure part. This preliminary preparation of the connection features allows for a strong, deformation-free assembly that maintains shutter strength while enabling independent manufacturing of the closure part and extensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If ejection force is applied during molding, then the shutter can be removed from the mold, but ejection marks appear on the flanks distorting the surface flatness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemolding speedVSAvoidsurface flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter is segmented into the closure part and extensions, with the extensions being attached after molding. This allows the closure part to be molded and ejected efficiently without concern for ejection marks on the extensions, maintaining productivity while ensuring the extensions retain their required surface flatness for effective rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2492127B1Frame for cooling module of a vehicle engine
Publication Date: 2016.11.02 VALEO SYST THERMIQUES SAS
  • EP2492127B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2a
  • EP2492127B1 patent drawingFigure 2b
  • EP2492127B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

The frame has a supporting framework (5), and a flap (10) to close entire or portion of an opening of the supporting framework. The supporting framework and the flap are arranged so as to be formed from same molding operation while authorizing the rotation of the flap around a rotation axis (19) between a closed position and an open position. The flap has a closing part and extensions (14a, 14b), where each extension extends laterally from the closing part of the flap in an articulation unit (20) of the flap. The supporting framework and the flap are molded with same material. An independent claim is also included for a method for molding a frame for engine cooling module of motor vehicle.