Aircraft Engine Corrosion Mitigation Using Contaminant-Based Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft engines face challenges in optimizing corrosion and erosion mitigation actions due to varying operating environments, leading to either excessive maintenance costs or reliability issues when uniform schedules are applied across all engines.

Innovation Solution

A method to monitor and analyze the environmental medium ingested by the engine in real-time, adjusting maintenance schedules based on contaminant concentrations and exposure times, using a medium collection system and controller to determine optimal mitigation actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a uniform predetermined frequency for corrosion and erosion mitigation actions is applied to all engines, then the maintenance schedule is simple to implement, but it leads to either excessive maintenance costs or reliability issues depending on varying environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance schedulingVSAvoidengine reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The maintenance schedule transitions from a static predetermined frequency to a dynamic schedule that adjusts based on real-time environmental monitoring data. The controller continuously receives contaminant concentration data and modifies mitigation action frequency accordingly, allowing the system to adapt to varying environmental conditions while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where environmental sensors continuously monitor contaminant concentrations, transmit data to the controller, which then adjusts the maintenance schedule based on actual conditions. This closed-loop control ensures that mitigation actions are performed at optimal intervals rather than fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If a uniform predetermined frequency for corrosion and erosion mitigation actions is applied to all engines, then the maintenance process is straightforward, but it results in unnecessary maintenance costs for engines in cleaner environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance processVSAvoidmaintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of maintenance frequency from a fixed value to a variable that responds to environmental parameters. By monitoring contaminant concentrations and adjusting maintenance intervals accordingly, the system reduces unnecessary maintenance actions in clean environments while increasing frequency in harsh conditions, optimizing cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The engine maintenance system becomes self-regulating through automated environmental monitoring and controller-based schedule adjustment. The system automatically determines when maintenance is needed based on actual environmental exposure, eliminating the need for conservative uniform scheduling and reducing wasteful maintenance expenditures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If environmental monitoring systems are implemented to optimize maintenance schedules, then maintenance can be tailored to actual conditions, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance optimizationVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is integrated into the existing engine control architecture, allowing the controller to serve multiple functions: traditional engine control and environmental monitoring for maintenance scheduling. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated monitoring hardware, thereby limiting complexity increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the existing environmental sensors and communication infrastructure as intermediaries to gather and transmit contaminant data. By leveraging available components rather than installing entirely new monitoring hardware, the system achieves optimized maintenance scheduling with minimal additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If real-time environmental monitoring is implemented, then maintenance actions can be precisely timed, but the system complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental condition monitoringVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary environmental monitoring and data analysis to determine maintenance needs before actual degradation occurs. By continuously tracking contaminant exposures and calculating accumulated damage, the system proactively schedules maintenance at optimal intervals, preventing premature failures while avoiding unnecessary interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4386183B1Method of mitigating corrosion and erosion in an aircraft engine
Publication Date: 2025.11.26 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • EP4386183B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4386183B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4386183B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of mitigating corrosion and erosion in an aircraft engine, includes: receiving a concentration of contaminants contained within a sample of an environmental medium ingested by the aircraft engine; determining a frequency of corrosion and erosion mitigation actions based on the concentration of the contaminants; and instructing a performance of the corrosion and erosion mitigation actions at the frequency.