Aircraft Engine Cover Detection System Using Sensor Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft engines are at risk of damage when starting due to the failure of crew members to visually confirm the removal of engine inlet covers or plugs, leading to potential intake of debris or objects, which can cause engine damage.

Innovation Solution

A cover detection system comprising sensors and a controller that interact with the engine cover to determine its installation status, preventing engine start if the cover is still in place, using RFID tags, magnetic detectors, and switch sensors to ensure safe engine operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If visual confirmation by crew members is used to verify cover removal, then the system is simple, but the reliability of detection is insufficient leading to potential engine damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical visual confirmation method with an automated sensor-based detection system. Sensors (optical, magnetic, or capacitive) automatically detect the presence or absence of the engine cover, eliminating reliance on crew member visual inspection and providing reliable automated detection without requiring complex mechanical verification mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system enables self-verification of cover status through automated sensing. The system independently determines whether the cover is installed without requiring human intervention for visual confirmation, allowing the engine system to self-check its own safety status before operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If automated sensor detection is implemented, then detection reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into independent sensor modules that can be individually positioned and configured. Each sensor detects a specific aspect of cover presence, and the results are integrated by the control system. This segmentation allows for modular implementation, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection reliability through multiple sensing points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed to detect cover presence through multiple sensing modalities (optical, magnetic, capacitive) that can be unified in a single detection architecture. The control system universally processes all sensor types to determine cover status, reducing complexity by using a single integrated control logic rather than separate verification systems for each sensor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If visual inspection is required, then the system remains simple, but the time for verification increases and human error occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine start efficiencyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system performs continuous or periodic detection of cover status before engine start is permitted. This preliminary automated verification eliminates the need for last-minute visual inspections by crew members, allowing the system to confirm cover removal status in advance and reducing the time required for final verification before engine operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system provides real-time feedback to the control system about cover status. When the cover is properly removed, the sensors immediately signal this state, allowing the system to proceed with engine start without additional verification steps. This feedback mechanism eliminates delays associated with manual visual inspection and ensures rapid, accurate verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the risk of engine damage by ensuring the engine cover is removed before starting, providing a reliable method for crew members to confirm cover installation and preventing potential engine damage.

Implementation Method 1

using RFID tags, magnetic detectors, and switch sensors to ensure safe engine operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRFID:

Implementation Method 2

using RFID tags, magnetic detectors, and switch sensors to ensure safe engine operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic detection: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

The controller is configured to determine whether the engine cover is installed on the engine based on an interaction between the first sensor component and the second sensor component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal processing:

Data Source

PatentUS10899467B2Engine inlet cover detection system and method
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORP
  • US10899467B2 patent drawing
  • US10899467B2 patent drawing
  • US10899467B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed embodiments describe cover detection systems, controllers, and aircraft. The aircraft includes the controller and parts of the cover detection systems. A cover detection system includes an engine, a first sensor, an engine cover assembly, and a controller. The engine has moving parts and defines a fluid opening. The fluid opening exposes the moving parts to an ambient environment. The first sensor component is located proximate to the engine. The engine cover assembly includes an engine cover and a second sensor. The engine cover is configured to cover the fluid opening. The second sensor component is attached to the engine cover and is configured to interact with the first sensor component. The controller is configured to determine whether the engine cover is installed on the engine based on an interaction between the first sensor component and the second sensor component.