Engine Emissions Diagnosis for Targeted Component Exchange

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine systems face challenges in efficiently diagnosing and optimizing the exchange of replaceable components to maintain emission reducing efficiency, which is often costly and time-consuming due to component deterioration, without effectively correlating deterioration status with emission reducing efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method for diagnosing engine systems that determines the exchange of replaceable components based on a known relation between component exchangeability data, such as downtime, cost, and CO2 emissions, to achieve the most efficient emission reducing efficiency by identifying the optimal component to exchange.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If component exchange is performed to maintain emission reducing efficiency, then emission reducing efficiency is improved, but cost and complexity of exchange increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission reducing efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of component exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The engine system is divided into multiple replaceable components (DOC, DPF, SCR catalyst, etc.), each with independent deterioration patterns. This segmentation allows targeted replacement of only the specific component that requires it, rather than replacing the entire exhaust aftertreatment system, thereby reducing exchange complexity while maintaining emission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors deterioration status parameters for each component and uses these parameter changes to determine when replacement is necessary. By tracking parameters like emission reducing efficiency over time, the system identifies optimal replacement timing, avoiding premature or unnecessary exchanges that would increase complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If component exchange is performed frequently to maintain emission reducing efficiency, then emission reducing efficiency is improved, but time and resources for exchange increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission reducing efficiencyVSAvoiddowntime for component exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and assessment of component deterioration status before exchange is required. By continuously tracking deterioration parameters and predicting when components will fail to meet emission standards, the system plans replacements in advance, avoiding urgent last-minute exchanges that would cause extended downtime and resource allocation issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from monitored deterioration status to dynamically adjust replacement schedules. By continuously measuring component performance and comparing it against thresholds, the system provides feedback that optimizes replacement timing, ensuring exchanges occur only when necessary to maintain emission efficiency, thereby minimizing unnecessary downtime and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive diagnosis of all components is performed, then accurate identification of components to exchange is improved, but diagnostic complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of component diagnosisVSAvoidcomplexity of diagnosis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses diagnostic efforts on specific replaceable components (DOC, DPF, SCR catalyst) that have distinct deterioration patterns and emission impacts. Rather than attempting to diagnose the entire exhaust system uniformly, the system isolates individual components for targeted assessment, reducing diagnostic complexity while maintaining accuracy for the most critical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The diagnosis system applies different assessment criteria and monitoring parameters tailored to each specific component type. Each component has its own deterioration efficiency parameter and diagnostic thresholds, allowing the system to evaluate each component with locally optimized methods rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach, thereby improving accuracy without proportionally increasing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4219927B1A method of diagnosing an engine system
Publication Date: 2026.05.06 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • EP4219927B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4219927B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4219927B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method of diagnosing an engine system (10) comprising an engine (15) and an exhaust aftertreatment system (20) for reducing emissions of the exhaust gases from the engine. The engine system comprises a plurality of replaceable engine system components (12). The method comprises maintaining (S10) a database (18) with component data, the component data comprising, for each one of the replaceable engine system components, a deterioration efficiency parameter (ηD1 - ηDn) correlating the deterioration status (DS) of the replaceable engine system component to emission reducing efficiency (ηE), and a utility component parameter (UC1 - UCn) comprising component exchangeability data (CE1 - CEn); determining (S20) the deterioration status (DS1 - DSn) of each one of the replaceable engine system components; estimating (S30) the emission reducing efficiency (ηE1 - ηEn) for each one of the replaceable engine system components in response to the determined deterioration status and the deterioration efficiency parameter; based on known relation between component exchangeability data and the resulting emission reducing efficiency of a potential exchange of the replaceable engine system component, identifying (S40) a replaceable engine system component to exchange.