Engine Fluid Flow Estimation Using Hydraulic Loss Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining fluid flow rates in vehicle engine systems, particularly when sensors are unavailable, are inefficient and require tedious calibration table construction due to changes in injector flow cross section caused by deposits or wear.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a supervised-learning loss estimation module, such as a neural network, to calculate a hydraulic loss coefficient based on pressure and temperature parameters, allowing for accurate estimation of fluid flow rates without direct measurement, and enabling predictive maintenance through alert thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional algorithmic logic with calibration tables is used to estimate flow rate, then the system can account for injector wear and deposits, but the process becomes tedious and complex due to the need to construct and maintain calibration tables

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate estimation accuracyVSAvoidcalibration table construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/calibration-based system with a neural network-based intelligent system. The neural network learns the complex relationship between injection parameters and actual flow rates automatically, eliminating the need for manual calibration table construction and maintenance while maintaining high estimation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network performs self-learning and self-adjustment by processing injection data automatically. It continuously improves its estimation capability without requiring external calibration table construction, making the system self-sufficient and reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If direct sensor measurement of flow rate is implemented, then accurate real-time flow rate data is obtained, but the system complexity and cost increase due to additional hardware requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate measurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem hardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a neural network as an intermediary computational model that indirectly estimates flow rate from easily measurable parameters (injection pressure, temperature, duration). This intermediary approach avoids the need for direct flow rate sensors while achieving comparable accuracy through intelligent inference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes physical measurement hardware (flow rate sensors) with an intelligent software-based estimation system. The neural network processes readily available sensor data to infer flow rate, replacing complex hardware measurement systems with a computationally efficient software solution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If calibration tables are constructed to account for injector changes over time, then the estimation adapts to wear and deposits, but the process requires significant time and resources for data collection and table construction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to injector changesVSAvoidcalibration table construction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network is pre-trained with comprehensive data covering various injector conditions (new, worn, with deposits). This preliminary training action equips the system with adaptive capability beforehand, eliminating the need for time-consuming calibration table construction when injector changes occur during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network provides dynamic adaptation capability that automatically adjusts to changing injector conditions in real-time. Unlike static calibration tables that require periodic reconstruction, the neural network continuously adapts its predictions based on current operating parameters, providing ongoing versatility without additional time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260043369A1Method for determining a flow rate of fluid in a vehicle engine system
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US20260043369A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043369A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043369A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining a value of a flow rate of a liquid in a vehicle engine system comprising a fluid tank (3), a pump (2), a fluid injector (1), with a fluid flow path from the pump to an injected zone (4), and an electronic control unit (5) for controlling opening of the injector, the method comprising:—providing a loss estimation module (52), supplying as output a hydraulic loss coefficient (CP),—carrying out a plurality of sequences of fluid injection, with values of a plurality of parameters (dP, P1, P0, T, X) being collected,—calculating a theoretical quantity (QTH) of fluid injected during these injection sequences, with the aid of the values of the parameters (P1, P0, T, X),—calculating an estimated actual quantity (QRE) of fluid injected during the injection sequences, by applying the loss coefficient (CP) to the calculation of the theoretical quantity of fluid.