Integrated Engine-Generator Control for Load-Adaptive Speed Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Engine-driven generators used for welding and similar operations lack customizable control over engine settings, leading to inefficient energy consumption and noise issues due to separate design configurations of engines and generators, with limited coordination between the two systems.

Innovation Solution

An integrated control system that regulates both engine and generator operations using an integrated controller, which receives input from sensors and user settings to manage engine speed, spark timing, fuel injection, and generator parameters, allowing for optimized power delivery and energy management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate control systems are used for engine and generator, then each system can operate independently with simple control design, but the overall system lacks coordination and customization capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol customizationVSAvoidcontrol system integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines separate engine control and generator control into a single integrated control system. The controller receives inputs from both engine sensors (RPM, temperature, load) and generator parameters, then coordinates their operation to achieve customized control profiles for different loads (welding vs. auxiliary), resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by unifying the control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated controller serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as an engine governor, a generator regulator, and a system coordinator. By making the control system universal, it can handle diverse operating conditions (welding loads, auxiliary loads, idle states) with a single device, improving adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Power

If engine speed is increased to meet welding load demands, then power delivery is improved, but energy consumption and noise increase during idle periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower deliveryVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts engine speed based on real-time load detection. The controller monitors load conditions and automatically transitions between idle speed, reduced speed, and full power speed modes. This dynamic adaptation allows the engine to deliver required power during welding while minimizing energy consumption during idle periods, resolving the contradiction between power delivery and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated control system continuously monitors engine parameters (RPM, load, temperature) and generator output, using this feedback to automatically adjust engine speed. When welding load is detected, the system increases speed; when idle or light load, it reduces speed. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to provide power when needed while conserving energy when not in use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If generic governor curve is used for engine speed control, then overshooting is prevented, but response time is slow and cannot distinguish between different load types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed stabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies different governor curves tailored to specific load types rather than using a single generic curve. For welding loads, a faster response curve is used to quickly meet high power demands. For auxiliary loads, a more conservative curve prevents overshooting. This localized control approach maintains reliability for each load type while improving overall response time through load-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes governor curve parameters based on detected load conditions. The controller selects from multiple pre-programmed governor curves or dynamically adjusts curve parameters (rise time, overshoot limits, steady-state speed) according to the load type. This parameter adaptation allows fast response for welding loads while maintaining stability for auxiliary loads, resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11745282B2Integrated engine-driven generator control system
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US11745282B2 patent drawing
  • US11745282B2 patent drawing
  • US11745282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine-driven welder/generator is controlled by an integrated controller that is coupled to both the engine and to the welder/generator. The controller receives input signals for operational parameters of the engine, and additional signals indicative of electrical output by the welder/generator. Operation of the engine and welder/generator may thus be coordinated. The controller may control speed, timing, fuel injection, and so forth of the engine, and output of the welder/generator, such as by control of input to a field coil.