Engine Health Prediction Using Adaptive Performance Curves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current engine health monitoring systems, such as Power Assurance Checks (PACs), require prolonged stable operation, introduce human error, and fail to accurately predict engine performance at varying load levels, making them burdensome for flight crews and limited in accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that collects engine data to determine health by receiving operating information, selecting a performance curve, and using curve-fitting processes to create an engine health model, allowing for accurate health assessment without requiring prolonged stable operation or high power levels, and reducing crew burden.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If Power Assurance Checks are performed using traditional methods requiring stable steady-state operation, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine health measurement accuracyVSAvoidtime required for stable operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and curve fitting during normal operation to establish baseline performance characteristics before actual health assessment is needed. This allows the system to have prediction models ready in advance, eliminating the need for prolonged stable operation at the time of assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical requirement for prolonged stable steady-state operation with a computational system that uses adaptive algorithms and curve fitting to analyze engine data. This substitution allows health assessment during transient operation without requiring the traditional mechanical stability conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If manual Power Assurance Checks are performed to reduce loss of time, then ease of operation improves, but measurement precision deteriorates due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for PAC completionVSAvoidengine health assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-assessment by automatically collecting engine data, fitting performance curves, and determining health status without requiring flight crew intervention. The engine health monitoring system serves itself by using its own operational data to assess its condition, eliminating human error while maintaining speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring engine parameters, comparing actual performance against fitted curves, and automatically updating health assessments. This closed-loop feedback mechanism replaces manual checking with automated real-time monitoring that is both fast and accurate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If Power Assurance Checks are performed at high engine loads to improve measurement precision, then measurement precision improves, but ease of operation deteriorates due to difficult operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine health prediction accuracyVSAvoiddifficulty of acquiring high load conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static assessment requiring fixed high-load conditions to dynamic assessment that adapts to varying operating conditions. The adaptive algorithm continuously adjusts the performance curves based on current engine operation, allowing accurate health assessment across the entire operating range without requiring specific high-load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the assessment parameters from requiring fixed high-load conditions to using variable parameters that adapt to current operating conditions. By using adaptive curve fitting that works across different load levels, the system eliminates the need to operate at difficult-to-acquire high loads while maintaining or improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If traditional PAC methods are used to reduce device complexity, then device complexity decreases, but reliability deteriorates due to assumptions about consistent performance across load levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of PAC systemVSAvoidaccuracy of engine health prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the engine performance assessment into multiple load-level specific evaluations rather than using a single blanket assessment. By fitting separate performance curves for different operating conditions and combining the results, the system achieves high reliability without excessive complexity, as each segment can be processed independently using standard algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11127231B2Adaptive algorithm-based engine health prediction
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US11127231B2 patent drawing
  • US11127231B2 patent drawing
  • US11127231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and algorithm-based method of determining engine health and assuring available propulsion power based on historical data reflecting the individual engine's unique performance “fingerprint.”