Engine Knock Control via Dynamic Spark Retard and Fluid Injection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling engine knock in alcohol-fueled engines often lead to degraded fuel economy and sub-optimal performance, as they bias towards ethanol injection when sufficient ethanol is available, neglecting the benefits of spark retard for better fuel economy or lower emissions.

Innovation Solution

A method that retards ignition spark timing up to a predetermined amount and increases direct injection of a knock control fluid, such as ethanol or gasoline, to address engine knock, while maintaining the spark timing at the predetermined level, optimizing fuel usage based on engine conditions and cost functions like fuel economy or emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ethanol injection is used to address engine knock when sufficient ethanol is available, then engine knock is suppressed, but fuel economy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine knock suppressionVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the knock control strategy by transitioning from ethanol injection to spark retardation based on real-time ethanol availability detection. When ethanol level drops below a threshold, the controller automatically switches to spark retardation mode, optimizing fuel economy while maintaining knock suppression effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameter from ethanol injection quantity to spark timing retardation when ethanol availability changes. This parameter substitution allows the system to maintain knock control functionality while improving fuel economy when ethanol is not available, as spark retardation does not consume additional fuel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If spark retard is used to address engine knock, then fuel economy improves, but engine performance becomes sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economyVSAvoidengine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between spark retardation and ethanol injection based on ethanol availability. When ethanol is sufficient, the system uses ethanol injection to maintain optimal spark timing and engine performance. When ethanol is depleted, it transitions to spark retardation to improve fuel economy, creating a dynamic performance-fuel economy optimization strategy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a backup control strategy (spark retardation) that replicates the knock suppression function of ethanol injection. This alternative approach ensures that knock control capability is maintained even when the primary method (ethanol injection) is unavailable, while offering improved fuel economy characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If ethanol injection is biased towards when sufficient ethanol is available, then knock control is effective, but emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknock control effectivenessVSAvoidexhaust emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the knock control method based on ethanol availability detection. When ethanol is insufficient, the controller automatically switches to spark retardation, which reduces exhaust emissions compared to ethanol injection, while maintaining effective knock control. This dynamic adaptation resolves the emissions issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves fuel economy and reduces emissions by judiciously using ethanol and gasoline, determining a break-even point for spark retard versus ethanol injection to minimize fuel losses and maximize engine performance.

Implementation Method 1

The charge-cooling effect of the high octane alcohol fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS8522749B2Method and system for controlling fuel usage
Publication Date: 2013.09.03 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8522749B2 patent drawing
  • US8522749B2 patent drawing
  • US8522749B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for improving fluid usage while addressing knock by adjusting the use of spark retard and direct injection of a fluid based on engine operating conditions and the composition of the injected fluid. One or more engine parameters, such as EGR, VCT, boost, throttle position, are coordinated with the direct injection to reduce torque and EGR transients.