Aircraft Engine Maintenance Forecasting from Damage Counter Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The variability in flight missions of aircraft engines, particularly military aircraft, makes it challenging to predict engine damage accurately, leading to uneven maintenance schedules and reduced aircraft availability due to frequent removals of damaged parts.

Innovation Solution

A predictive maintenance system that uses a computer-based forecasting method to simulate damage counter consumption from a mission database, optimizing maintenance strategies by analyzing flight parameters and simulating mission scenarios to anticipate maintenance needs and improve engine availability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maintenance operations are performed based on damage counters reaching maximums, then component safety is ensured, but aircraft availability decreases due to frequent and uneven removals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent safetyVSAvoidaircraft availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation of damage counter consumption using Monte Carlo methods to predict future maintenance needs before they occur. By analyzing multiple possible mission scenarios and their impact on damage counters, the system anticipates when components will reach their damage ceilings, allowing maintenance to be planned in advance rather than reactively, thus improving aircraft availability while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The maintenance planning system dynamically adjusts maintenance schedules based on simulated damage counter trajectories. Instead of fixed schedules, the system adapts maintenance timing to predicted actual damage accumulation patterns, optimizing the balance between component safety and aircraft availability by performing maintenance only when genuinely needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If damage counters are monitored for each component, then maintenance precision is improved, but the complexity of maintenance management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage monitoring precisionVSAvoidmaintenance management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates virtual copies of damage counters through simulation, generating multiple possible damage counter trajectories for each component. These simulated copies allow comprehensive analysis of maintenance needs without adding physical monitoring complexity, as the simulation model processes the data and generates maintenance recommendations automatically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where simulated damage counter results feed into maintenance planning decisions. The simulation continuously refines predictions based on actual mission data and maintenance outcomes, creating a self-optimizing system that reduces management complexity over time through automated learning and adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If maintenance operations are grouped together, then aircraft availability is improved, but maintenance cost increases due to larger removals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft availabilityVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation to identify optimal windows for grouping maintenance operations. By predicting when multiple damage counters will reach their ceilings simultaneously under different mission scenarios, the system identifies opportunities to bundle maintenance tasks, improving aircraft availability through reduced removal frequency while controlling costs through intelligent grouping rather than arbitrary consolidation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies the grouping parameters (time windows, mission types, component priorities) in simulations to find the optimal balance between aircraft availability and maintenance cost. By adjusting these parameters and analyzing their impact on both objectives, the system identifies cost-effective grouping strategies tailored to specific operational contexts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3080670B1Forecasting maintenance operations to be applied to an engine
Publication Date: 2024.10.23 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • EP3080670B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3080670B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3080670B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

The invention concerns a method and system for forecasting maintenance operations to be applied to an aircraft engine comprising a plurality of elements monitored by damage counters, each damage counter being limited by a corresponding damage ceiling, characterised in that it comprises: - processing means (7) suitable for simulating a consumption of said damage counters (C1-Cm) by iteratively pulling a series of simulation missions from a learning database (9) containing test missions, - processing means (7) suitable for determining, at each iteration, an accumulation of consumption of each of said damage counters until at least one counter counting damage related to a current simulation mission reaches the damage ceiling associated with same, - processing means (7) suitable for applying a maintenance strategy to said current simulation mission to determine maintenance indicators representative of the maintenance operations to be planned on the aircraft engine.