Aircraft Engine Oil Cooling Bypass for Adaptive Heat Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft engine lubrication systems face challenges in adapting to varying cooling requirements, leading to increased cost, size, and complexity due to the need for a cooling system that can effectively manage heat rejection under different operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

An oil cooling system with a heat exchanger, flow restrictor, and bypass valve that allows for adaptive heat rejection by directing oil flows through either a heat exchanger or a bypass passage, depending on operating conditions, to optimize heat transfer to air or fuel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a cooling system is designed to adapt to varying operating conditions, then cooling effectiveness is improved, but cost, size, weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling adaptabilityVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a dynamic bypass valve that automatically adjusts the flow distribution between the heat exchanger and bypass passages based on operating conditions. The valve responds to pressure differential changes caused by flow restrictors, enabling the cooling system to adapt its configuration without complex control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system uses self-regulating flow restrictors and pressure-differential-based valve control that automatically adjust cooling flow paths without external control signals. The system serves itself by using its own operating parameters (pressure differentials, flow rates) to control its behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If multiple heat exchangers are used to handle varying cooling loads, then cooling performance is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidheat exchanger configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system segments the oil flow into multiple paths: a first portion through the heat exchanger and a second portion through the bypass. This segmentation allows independent control of cooling intensity by adjusting the bypass valve, providing variable cooling capacity without requiring multiple separate heat exchanger units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The single heat exchanger is designed to handle the entire oil flow when maximum cooling is required, while the bypass passages provide an alternative path for partial flow. This multi-functional configuration allows the same heat exchanger to operate at different capacity levels based on system needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a simple, compact, and cost-effective means to adaptively control oil cooling, optimizing heat rejection and reducing the complexity of the cooling system while maintaining efficiency across different operating conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the heat exchanger facilitating heat transfer from the first portion of the oil to a first fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS11591964B2Oil cooling system for aircraft engine
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US11591964B2 patent drawing
  • US11591964B2 patent drawing
  • US11591964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An oil cooling system for an aircraft engine, a bypass valve and an associate method of cooling aircraft engine oil are provided. The oil cooling system includes a heat exchanger having an inlet and an outlet. The inlet is in fluid communication with a first oil conduit to receive a first oil flow from the first oil conduit. The heat exchanger facilitates heat transfer from the first oil flow to another fluid. A flow restrictor defining a constriction is operatively disposed to restrict the first oil flow through the heat exchanger. A second oil conduit receives the first oil flow from the heat exchanger. A bypass oil passage provides fluid communication between the first oil conduit and the second oil conduit to allow a second oil flow received from the first oil conduit to flow to the second oil conduit and bypass the heat exchanger.