Engine Oil Life Estimation Using Reference Lubrication Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining the remaining life of engine oil in vehicles are cumbersome, inaccurate, and require oil sampling, which is not feasible for real-time monitoring, especially under stringent fuel efficiency and emissions regulations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a reference engine data apparatus to determine reference engine parameters and oil lubrication data through sensor data and mechanical testing, generating a reference model that is used by an engine apparatus to estimate the remaining life of engine oil without the need for on-site sampling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If organic or organic metallic friction modifiers are added to reduce surface friction and improve fuel economy, then fuel economy is improved, but deposit formation increases and anti-wear protection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economyVSAvoiddeposit formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of engine operating conditions and oil quality parameters to predict remaining oil life before critical deterioration occurs. By continuously monitoring parameters like soot content, viscosity changes, and contaminant levels, the system proactively determines optimal oil change timing, preventing both premature changes (wasting resources) and delayed changes (causing damage).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor engine operating conditions, oil quality parameters, and component wear rates. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of maintenance schedules and provides real-time information about oil degradation trends, allowing the system to adapt to actual usage patterns rather than relying on fixed intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If traditional oil sampling methods are used to determine oil quality, then measurement accuracy is improved, but operational complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidsampling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical oil sampling operations with automated electronic sensors and computational analysis. Instead of physically extracting oil samples and performing laboratory analysis, the system uses in-line sensors to continuously monitor oil properties such as viscosity, contaminant levels, and chemical composition, eliminating the need for manual sampling while maintaining or improving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the engine monitoring function to serve itself by integrating sensors directly into the lubrication system. The monitoring apparatus automatically collects data, processes information, and generates maintenance recommendations without requiring external intervention or specialized equipment, making the system self-sufficient and easy to implement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If fixed interval oil change schedules are used, then ease of operation is improved, but fuel efficiency and operational reliability deteriorate due to premature or delayed changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance scheduling simplicityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, fixed-interval maintenance schedules to dynamic, condition-based scheduling. By continuously monitoring actual oil degradation rates and engine operating conditions, the system adjusts maintenance timing to match real-world usage patterns, extending oil life when conditions are favorable and prompting earlier changes when degradation accelerates, thereby optimizing both simplicity and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors multiple oil quality parameters simultaneously (viscosity, contaminant concentration, chemical composition, temperature profiles) and uses changes in these parameters to determine optimal replacement timing. This multi-parameter approach provides a comprehensive view of oil health, enabling more accurate predictions of remaining life compared to single-parameter or fixed-interval methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3821240B1System and method for determining remaining life of engine oil in an engine
Publication Date: 2023.10.11 WARTSILA FINLAND OY
  • EP3821240B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3821240B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3821240B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A computer implemented method system and apparatus for determining remaining life of engine oil in an engine, the method comprising generating reference engine profile data by determining reference engine parameters of a reference engine; determining reference engine oil lubrication data based on mechanical testing of an oil sample from the reference engine; generating a reference model by associating the reference engine profile data with the reference engine oil lubrication data; receiving the reference model at an engine apparatus; measuring engine parameters relating to operation conditions of an engine of the engine apparatus; and determining remaining life of engine oil in the engine of the engine apparatus using the reference model and the engine parameters.