Engine Power Modulation via Periodic Acceleration Cycles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Internal combustion engines in vehicles often operate at less than maximum rated power for extended periods, leading to reduced fuel efficiency due to the need to accommodate varying driving conditions, which compromises vehicle performance when fuel economy is a priority.

Innovation Solution

A method that intermittently operates the engine at or near maximum rated power, alternating between acceleration and deceleration phases to maintain a target velocity, reducing fuel input during deceleration and preventing back-driving of the engine during deceleration, thereby optimizing fuel efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the engine is sized to meet maximum vehicle performance requirements, then vehicle performance is sufficient, but fuel efficiency deteriorates when operating at partial load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle performanceVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic acceleration and deceleration cycles, alternating between high-power operation at maximum engine power range and low-power operation during deceleration phases. This periodic action allows the engine to operate efficiently at partial load while maintaining the capability for maximum performance when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes engine operating parameters by adjusting fueling rates and selecting different torque/speed map zones based on whether the vehicle is in acceleration or deceleration phase. This allows optimization of fuel efficiency during deceleration while preserving maximum power capability during acceleration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If the engine operates at maximum rated power continuously, then fuel efficiency is improved, but vehicle velocity control deteriorates under varying driving conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidvelocity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts engine operation between two distinct modes: maximum power range operation during acceleration phases and reduced power operation during deceleration phases. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize fuel efficiency while maintaining appropriate velocity control for varying driving conditions through controller-mediated adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If the engine is allowed to back-drive during deceleration, then energy recovery is possible, but fuel efficiency deteriorates due to engine braking effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the harmful back-driving effect from the engine during deceleration phases by preventing the drive wheels from acting as a brake on the engine. This is achieved through controller-mediated fueling reduction and power flow path management, isolating the engine from the detrimental reverse torque while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10005466B2Engine power modulation in a vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 INT ENGINE INTPROP CO LLC
  • US10005466B2 patent drawing
  • US10005466B2 patent drawing
  • US10005466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control strategy for a vehicle powered by an internal combustion engine has a repeating cycle of accelerating the vehicle during a more fuel efficient acceleration phase of the cycle followed by a deceleration phase of the cycle which uses little or no fuel.