Engine Purge System Using Supercharger Pressure Differential

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing purge systems for internal combustion engines face challenges with increased electric power consumption, installation space, and costs when using electric pumps, and insufficient purge quantity due to low negative pressure from supercharging devices.

Innovation Solution

A purge system that utilizes pressure differences between the upstream and downstream sides of a supercharging device to desorb fuel vapor from an adsorbent in a canister, eliminating the need for an electric pump, and effectively controls valve operations to ensure sufficient purge quantity across various engine operational states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If an electric pump is provided in the purge passage to purge fuel vapor, then the purge function is improved, but electric power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurge quantityVSAvoidelectric power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the electric pump from the purge system, replacing it with a valve-based control mechanism that utilizes existing pressure differentials in the intake air passage to achieve fuel vapor purge without additional energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes the natural negative pressure generated by the engine's intake operation and supercharging device to drive the purge process, eliminating the need for external power sources and making the system self-sufficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If an electric pump is provided in the purge passage, then the purge function is improved, but installation space increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurge quantityVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The electric pump is completely removed from the system and replaced with electronically controlled valves that are integrated into the existing fuel vapor passage structure, significantly reducing the space required for the purge system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Use of energy by moving object

If the negative pressure from supercharging device is used to purge fuel vapor, then power consumption is reduced, but purge quantity becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidpurge quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between two purge modes: utilizing negative pressure from the supercharging device during supercharging operations, and switching to positive pressure from a pressure generation device during non-supercharging operations, ensuring sufficient purge quantity under all operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the pressure parameter used for purge based on operating conditions - using negative pressure during supercharging and positive pressure during normal operation, thereby maintaining effective purge quantity across different engine states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If a purge control valve and electric pump are placed in the purge passage, then purge control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurge controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electric pump is removed from the purge passage, simplifying the system structure while maintaining purge control functionality through electronically controlled valves that regulate flow based on pressure differentials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses pressure differential-based flow control through valves, utilizing the natural pressure variations in the intake air passage and fuel vapor passage to achieve effective purge control without mechanical pumps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a sufficient purge quantity without additional devices, reducing power consumption and costs, and effectively desorbs fuel vapor using pressure differences, ensuring efficient operation during both supercharging and non-supercharging periods.

Implementation Method 1

the fuel vapor is supplied from the fuel tank into a canister, which contains an adsorbent to temporarily adsorb the fuel vapor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

The negative pressure, which is generated in an intake air pipe during an operation of the engine, is used to desorb the fuel vapor from the adsorbent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Data Source

PatentUS7284541B1Purge system for internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2007.10.23 DENSO CORP
  • US7284541B1 patent drawing
  • US7284541B1 patent drawing
  • US7284541B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A canister is connected with a fuel tank to adsorb fuel vapor generated in the fuel tank. The canister is also connected to a downstream side point of an intake air pipe, which is on a downstream side of a supercharging device, through a first purge line. The canister is also connected to an upstream side point of the intake air pipe, which is on an upstream side of the supercharging device, through a second purge line. An ECU opens a first valve of the first purge line and a second valve of the second purge line to generate an air flow through the first connection passage, the canister and the second connection passage to desorb the fuel vapor from the adsorbent and to purge the desorbed fuel vapor into the intake air passage in an operational period of the supercharging device.