Engine Start-Stop Control via Accessory Temperature Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional engine start-stop controls fail to effectively manage temperature conditions in engine systems, leading to degradation and damage during hot shutdown events, resulting in significant fuel losses.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling engine re-start based on temperature information from engine accessories, using a thermal model to predict when accessory temperatures will exceed thresholds, allowing for proactive re-starts to prevent damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the engine is idled after high load operation to avoid hot shutdown events, then the degradation and damage to temperature sensitive engine system components is prevented, but significant fuel savings are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of temperature sensitive componentsVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of accessory temperatures and predicts future temperature conditions before making the shutdown decision. By evaluating current accessory temperatures and projecting their evolution during shutdown, the system determines in advance whether shutdown is safe, allowing fuel-saving shutdowns without risking component damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors accessory temperatures and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust shutdown decisions. Temperature sensor data feeds into the shutdown logic, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to actual thermal conditions rather than using fixed rules, optimizing both component protection and fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If conventional start-stop controls are used without temperature monitoring, then the system complexity is reduced, but degradation and damage to engine system components occurs during hot shutdown events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidcomponent protection during shutdown
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces temperature monitoring sensors and a control system as intermediary elements between the engine operation and shutdown decision-making. These intermediaries provide the necessary temperature information to make informed shutdown decisions, acting as a bridge between physical thermal conditions and control logic without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces simple mechanical or rule-based shutdown controls with an intelligent control system that processes temperature data. The control module uses algorithmic decision-making based on thermal conditions rather than fixed mechanical thresholds, enabling more nuanced and accurate shutdown timing while maintaining practical system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the engine shutdown timing is delayed to prevent hot shutdown events, then component degradation is avoided, but the productivity and fuel efficiency of start-stop operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent safety during shutdownVSAvoidfuel saving opportunity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the shutdown timing parameter based on accessory temperature conditions. Rather than using a fixed delay or rule, the shutdown moment is adjusted according to real-time temperature measurements and predictions, optimizing the balance between component protection and fuel efficiency by finding the precise window where shutdown is both safe and beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The shutdown control transitions from a static, predetermined timing approach to a dynamic, condition-based approach. The system continuously evaluates thermal conditions and adapts shutdown timing accordingly, making the control strategy flexible and responsive to changing engine states rather than following a rigid schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes engine degradation and fuel losses by optimizing re-start timing based on accessory temperature predictions, ensuring safe operation and efficient fuel management.

Implementation Method 1

a thermal model of an accessory such as a turbocharger or one or more components thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

accounting for a rate of temperature increase and may be determined based upon a thermal model

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS9447764B2Internal combustion engine start-stop controls
Publication Date: 2016.09.20 CUMMINS INC
  • US9447764B2 patent drawing
  • US9447764B2 patent drawing
  • US9447764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, methods, and systems for conditionally re-starting an internal combustion engine are disclosed. Certain exemplary embodiments evaluate information associated with a temperature of an accessory of an internal combustion engine and conditionally re-start the internal combustion engine after an engine shutdown based at least in part upon said information and a determination that a post-engine-shutdown temperature of the engine accessory would exceed a predetermined criterion. In certain embodiments the accessory includes a component of a turbocharger. In certain embodiments the accessory includes a component of an exhaust aftertreatment system.