Aircraft Engine Status Indication System for Start Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft engine flight deck displays lack explicit and easy-to-use information for pilots to determine engine start/recovery progress, automation modes, and operational states, leading to increased crew workload and potential errors during engine start or recovery processes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that provide explicit and intuitive engine start/recovery information, including graphical and alphanumeric indicators for target idle running speed, predicted core speed, and automation mode, to aid pilots in quickly assessing engine status and making timely decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional engine display screens present detailed engine parameter data, then engineers can monitor engine status, but crew workload increases and response time decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine status informationVSAvoidcrew workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The display is segmented into multiple functional zones: a primary indicator showing the simplified engine state (starting, running, or stopped), secondary indicators showing detailed parameters only when needed, and a timer display showing time to running. This segmentation allows the system to present comprehensive information while hiding complexity from the crew during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of presenting all detailed engine parameters continuously and requiring the crew to interpret them, the system inverts the approach by presenting a simplified, intuitive state indicator first, and only providing detailed parameters when the simplified view is insufficient. This reduces the cognitive load on the crew while maintaining information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If the system provides detailed engine parameter monitoring, then engine status can be accurately determined, but the time required for crew interpretation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine status detectionVSAvoidcrew interpretation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of engine parameters to determine the simplified state indicator (starting, running, or stopped) and the time to running before the crew needs to interpret the data. This pre-computation eliminates the need for the crew to manually analyze multiple parameters in real-time, reducing their interpretation time while maintaining accurate status detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to the crew through the simplified state indicator and timer display, allowing them to immediately understand engine status without manual analysis. The timer display provides feedback on time to running, enabling the crew to make informed decisions about when to expect the engine to be fully operational without needing to continuously monitor detailed parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If the display shows current core speed only, then the display remains simple, but the crew cannot determine when the engine is running without estimation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay complexityVSAvoidengine operational state information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds a temporal dimension to the display by showing the time to running in addition to the current core speed. This time dimension provides the crew with critical information about when the engine will be fully operational, enabling them to plan actions accordingly without adding significant visual complexity to the display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The simplified state indicator (starting, running, or stopped) acts as an intermediary between the complex engine parameters and the crew's decision-making process. This intermediary translation layer converts detailed parameter data into intuitive state information that the crew can quickly understand and act upon, bridging the gap between technical data and operational decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP1930239B1Method and apparatus for indicating operational state of aircraft engine
Publication Date: 2011.01.12 THE BOEING CO
  • EP1930239B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1930239B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP1930239B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A method and a system for indicating a target idle running speed, a predicted core speed, a predicted time to running, current engine state or automation modes of an operating aircraft engine, and indicating that the current core speed of the aircraft engine is less than a target idle running speed or is abnormally decreasing towards a target idle running speed. The indicators may be visual or aural. The visual indicators may include graphical or numeric symbols indicating the target idle running speed, the direction of core speed change, the predicted core speed at some future time, or current engine state or automation mode.