Engine Stop Device Crankshaft Positioning Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine stop devices struggle to accurately and quickly stop the crankshaft at a target position, often requiring high control resolution which leads to longer processing times and potential displacement due to air pressure, affecting fuel efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An engine stop device with a detection part and a control part that selects from multiple maps based on the difference between the current and target crankshaft positions, using a low-resolution map for quick positioning and a high-resolution correction map for precise adjustment, reducing processing load and avoiding unnecessary motor power usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high control resolution is used to stop the crankshaft accurately at the target position, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to longer processing times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankshaft stop position accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time to stop crankshaft
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control process is divided into two distinct phases: a first control phase using a first map with lower resolution forç²— positioning, and a second control phase using a second map with higher resolution for fine positioning. This segmentation allows the system to achieve both speed and accuracy by handling different stages of the stopping process with appropriately optimized control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically switches between different maps based on the current crankshaft position and the remaining distance to the target position. The control resolution is adjusted in real-time, transitioning from lower resolution when the crankshaft is far from the target to higher resolution when approaching the target, optimizing both response time and positioning accuracy throughout the stopping process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If high control resolution is used to ensure accurate stop position, then device complexity increases due to higher processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankshaft stop position accuracyVSAvoidcontrol processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control maps are segmented into different resolution levels. The first map contains control data with lower resolution suitable for the majority of the stopping distance, while the second map contains control data with higher resolution for the final positioning phase. This segmentation reduces the overall processing complexity compared to using high-resolution data throughout the entire stopping process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different control resolutions are applied to different portions of the stopping process. Lower resolution control is used when the crankshaft is far from the target position, and higher resolution control is used only when the crankshaft is close to the target position. This local quality approach ensures high accuracy is achieved only where necessary, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the crankshaft is stopped quickly at the target position, then productivity is improved, but reliability decreases due to potential displacement by air pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine stop response timeVSAvoidcrankshaft position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary positioning using the first map to bring the crankshaft close to the target position quickly, then switches to the second map with higher resolution for fine adjustment. This preliminary action allows the system to achieve most of the stopping distance rapidly while ensuring final precision, thereby maintaining both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors the crankshaft position and uses feedback to determine when to switch between the first and second maps. This feedback mechanism ensures that the crankshaft is positioned accurately at the target position and remains stable, preventing displacement by air pressure while maintaining quick response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9694809B2Engine stop device
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9694809B2 patent drawing
  • US9694809B2 patent drawing
  • US9694809B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine stop device includes: a detection part that detects a difference between a current position of a crankshaft and a target stop position of the crankshaft; and a control part that controls a motor based on the detected difference so that the crankshaft is able to approach the target stop position when an engine is stopped or after the engine is stopped. The control part selects one of a plurality of maps that define a relationship between a moving distance and a rotational speed based on the detected difference, and controls the motor based on the selected map.