Engine Torque Control During Fuel-Cut Recovery With EGR Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine control systems face challenges in managing torque shocks during restoration from fuel cut due to excessive air supply during EGR learning/diagnosis, leading to unstable combustion and driver discomfort.

Innovation Solution

An engine controller that includes an exhaust gas recirculation valve, fuel injection device, and ignition device, with a processor that calculates and adjusts torque by controlling the EGR valve, throttle, and ignition timing to balance air supply and reduce torque shocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If EGR learning/diagnosis is performed during fuel cut, then the EGR device can be diagnosed and learned, but excessive air is supplied into the cylinder causing torque level difference and torque shock during restoration from fuel cut

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEGR device diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidtorque shock
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs preliminary calculations of correction torque and EGR valve opening degree before actual restoration from fuel cut occurs. By pre-computing these values based on detected air flow rates and predetermined maps, the system prepares compensation data in advance that will be applied immediately upon restoration, preventing torque shock before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the air flow rate through the EGR valve during fuel cut and uses this feedback to calculate correction torque. The detected air flow rate is fed back to the controller, which then computes the necessary torque correction and EGR valve adjustment to compensate for excessive air supply, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to actual conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If retard control of ignition timing is applied during restoration from fuel cut, then torque shock is alleviated, but engine torque becomes insufficient when EGR learning/diagnosis has caused excessive air supply

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque shockVSAvoidengine torque
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts multiple parameters simultaneously: ignition timing is retarded to reduce torque shock, while correction torque is calculated and applied to compensate for power loss. The EGR valve opening degree is also adjusted based on predetermined maps. This multi-parameter coordination allows the system to reduce torque shock without sacrificing engine torque, as the correction torque counteracts the retarding effect of ignition timing change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250389232A1Engine controller
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 SUBARU CORP
  • US20250389232A1 patent drawing
  • US20250389232A1 patent drawing
  • US20250389232A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine controller includes an exhaust gas recirculation valve, a fuel injection device, an ignition device, and a controller including a processor. The processor includes a requested torque setter, a surplus torque setter, a comparator, and a correction torque setter. The requested torque setter sets requested torque, on the occasion of restoration from fuel cut. The surplus torque setter sets, on the occasion of the restoration from the fuel cut, surplus torque in combustion based on a flow rate of the air to pass through the exhaust gas recirculation valve. The comparator makes a comparison between the requested torque and the surplus torque. The correction torque setter sets, based on a result of the comparison, correction torque to correct the amount of the air to pass through a throttle valve and to make retard correction of ignition timing.