Enhanced Random Access Procedure for 5G Unlicensed Spectrum Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional random access methods in wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G/NR communications, face challenges such as high latency and limited equipment capacity when accessing unlicensed spectra due to the listen-before-talk process, which increases latency and affects system performance.

Innovation Solution

A contention-based random access procedure is introduced, allowing for a 2-step or 4-step contention-based Random Access (RACH) process with multiple time windows and a window indication field in the MAC RAR, enabling the UE to retry the RACH if the initial response is not received within the first time window, thereby reducing latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a listen-before-talk (LBT) process is performed during each step of a RACH procedure when accessing an unlicensed spectrum, then channel availability is determined, but latency is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel availabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the LBT process in advance before the RACH procedure begins. The gNB performs LBT to determine uplink channel availability before allocating RACH resources, so that when the UE attempts random access, the channel is already confirmed to be available, eliminating the need for repeated LBT checks during each RACH step and thereby reducing latency while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If a random access response (RAR) window is set with a fixed expiration time, then the RACH procedure has a defined timeout, but latency increases when RAR is not received before window expiration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure definitionVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the RAR window adaptive rather than fixed. The gNB dynamically adjusts the RAR window expiration time based on the actual channel conditions and LBT outcomes. When the channel is available, the window can be shorter; when conditions are poor, the window is extended, allowing the UE more time to receive RAR without unnecessary latency penalties, thus resolving the contradiction between having a defined timeout and minimizing latency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the gNB monitors whether UEs successfully receive RAR within the window and adjusts subsequent RAR window durations based on this feedback. This closed-loop approach allows the system to learn from past performance and optimize timing parameters, reducing latency while maintaining procedural definition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If traditional random access methods are used with scheduled data transmissions, then resource allocation is controlled, but equipment capacity is limited and latency is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource controlVSAvoidequipment capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by enabling the gNB to perform multiple functions with a single LBT operation. Instead of separate LBT checks for each RACH step and separate resource allocation procedures, the gNB performs one LBT check and then handles both channel access control and resource allocation together. This multi-functional approach increases equipment capacity by reducing the number of control operations needed while maintaining resource control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the LBT process from the traditional scheduled transmission framework and applies it specifically to the RACH procedure context. By separating the channel access determination from the general resource allocation mechanism, the system can handle random access more efficiently with dedicated capacity while other scheduled transmissions continue with their own control mechanisms, thereby increasing overall equipment capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3949634B1Method and apparatus for performing enhanced random access procedure
Publication Date: 2024.10.02 ZTE CORP
  • EP3949634B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3949634B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3949634B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method and apparatus for performing an enhanced random access (RACH) procedure is disclosed. In one embodiment, a method performed by a wireless communication node, includes: transmitting first information to a wireless communication device; receiving a first message from the wireless communication device; and transmitting a second message to the wireless communication device, wherein the first information comprises information of a plurality of time windows for the wireless communication device to receive the second message.