Enlarged Backside Contact Structure for Low-Resistance GAA FETs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming contacts in semiconductor devices, particularly in gate-all-around FETs, face challenges in reducing resistance and maintaining effective gate control as device sizes decrease, leading to increased complexity and fabrication costs.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming an enlarged backside contact by extending the recess for the source or drain structure deeper into the substrate, using a dummy contact structure, and then replacing it with a conductive material after forming a sidewall spacer and dielectric layer, resulting in a larger backside contact that reduces resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If device size is decreased to increase functional density, then production efficiency is improved and costs are lowered, but device performance degradation and fabrication complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The contact structure transitions from a planar two-dimensional configuration to a three-dimensional enlarged contact with a wider upper portion and narrower lower portion. This dimensional change allows the contact to maintain larger effective area for lower resistance while accommodating the reduced device footprint, thus improving productivity without sacrificing device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The contact structure employs non-uniform cross-sectional geometry with different widths at different heights. The upper portion has a larger width to reduce contact resistance, while the lower portion has a smaller width to maintain gate control. This local differentiation of geometric properties resolves the contradiction between lowering resistance and maintaining gate control in scaled devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If contact size is increased to reduce resistance, then device performance is improved, but gate control and pitch density are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidgate control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The contact structure employs non-uniform cross-sectional geometry with different widths at different heights. The upper portion has a larger width to reduce contact resistance, while the lower portion has a smaller width to maintain gate control. This local differentiation of geometric properties resolves the contradiction between lowering resistance and maintaining gate control in scaled devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The contact structure transitions from a planar two-dimensional configuration to a three-dimensional enlarged contact with a wider upper portion and narrower lower portion. This dimensional change allows the contact to maintain larger effective area for lower resistance while accommodating the reduced device footprint, thus improving productivity without sacrificing device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional contact formation is used, then fabrication process is simpler, but resistance is higher and performance is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication processVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A dummy contact structure is formed in advance during the fabrication process. This dummy structure serves as a template that guides subsequent processing steps, including the formation of the enlarged contact. The preliminary action of creating this placeholder structure enables the complex enlarged contact geometry to be achieved through systematic processing rather than requiring entirely new fabrication techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The dummy contact structure acts as an intermediary element that facilitates the formation of the final enlarged contact. It provides a structural framework that guides material deposition and removal processes, enabling the transformation from a simple contact to an enlarged contact with optimized geometry for reduced resistance while maintaining gate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250301741A1Enlarged backside contact
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20250301741A1 patent drawing
  • US20250301741A1 patent drawing
  • US20250301741A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor structure includes a stack of channel layers, a source/drain feature connected to the stack of channel layers, a gate structure wrapping around the stack of channel layers, a dielectric liner disposed on a bottom surface of the gate structure, and a source/drain contact underlying the source/drain feature and the stack of channel layers and landing on the dielectric liner. The source/drain contact is electrically connected to the source/drain feature.