eNodeB Shared Scheduling Request Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current LTE systems face challenges in managing the increasing population of connected-mode users, leading to high access latency and inefficient use of uplink resources due to the dedicated scheduling request (SR) approach, which results in sub-optimal resource utilization and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a common or shared SR resource using existing PUCCH formats, such as PUCCH format 2 or 3, to explicitly convey user IDs, allowing multiple users to share the same resource and reducing the need for physical layer redesign, thereby enhancing resource efficiency and lowering access latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If dedicated scheduling request (SR) resources are assigned to each user, then access latency is reduced for individual users, but resource efficiency deteriorates and access latency increases for the overall system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess latencyVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple users are merged into a single group that shares common scheduling request resources. Instead of assigning dedicated SR resources to each user, the patent combines multiple users into groups where users within the same group share the same SR resources, thereby improving resource efficiency while managing access latency through group-based scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Common SR resources are designed to serve multiple users simultaneously. The scheduling request resources are made universal by allowing any user within a group to utilize the same SR resources, transforming dedicated resources into multi-functional shared resources that can handle requests from multiple users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If dedicated SR resources are assigned to each user, then individual user access is improved, but system capacity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual user accessVSAvoidsystem capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Users are merged into groups that share common SR resources. By combining multiple users into single groups with shared resources, the system increases overall capacity to handle more users with the same resource pool, while individual users within each group maintain ease of access through their group's dedicated SR resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a group dimension to the resource allocation hierarchy. Instead of flat individual user-to-resource mapping, it creates a two-dimensional structure where users are organized into groups, and each group is assigned SR resources. This dimensional change allows the system to scale capacity by creating more groups rather than requiring more individual resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of energy

If common SR resources are shared by multiple users, then resource efficiency is improved, but access latency increases due to contention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidaccess latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The user population is segmented into multiple groups, each with its own set of common SR resources. By dividing users into segments (groups) rather than having all users compete for a single pool of resources, the contention within each group is reduced, thereby lowering access latency while maintaining resource efficiency through shared resources within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic group-based scheduling where users can be assigned to different groups and utilize different SR resources based on current system conditions and user activity patterns. This dynamic allocation allows the system to adapt to varying loads and minimize contention-induced latency while optimizing resource efficiency in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2795983B1A method implemented in an enhanced nodeb base station, corresponding enhandced node b and computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2019.04.24 BLACKBERRY LTD
  • EP2795983B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2795983B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2795983B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

In some implementations, a method implemented in an eNodeB base station (eNB) for a single carrier frequency division multiple access SC-FDMA wireless system includes receiving an uplink control channel signal on an assigned scheduling request resource. A user ID is decoded from the received uplink control channel signal. A message assigning a portion of a resource of the wireless system to a UE associated with the decoded user ID is transmitted.