Ensemble Confidence Models for Ranked Classification Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning models (MLMs) often produce classification results that are not accurate enough for specific tasks, necessitating improved methods to enhance prediction accuracy.

Innovation Solution

Training an ensemble confidence machine learning model (EC-MLM) that combines multiple predictor MLMs and confidence MLMs to generate an aggregated ranked list of classifications, using weighted predictions and confidences to select the most likely correct classification for each data item.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single machine learning model is used for classification, then the system complexity is low, but the classification accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the classification task into multiple independent predictor models, each trained on different aspects or subsets of the training data. These segmented models work in parallel to provide diverse predictions, which are then aggregated to achieve higher overall accuracy than any single model could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the predictions from multiple predictor models and confidence models into a unified ensemble confidence model. By combining the outputs of these individual models through aggregation and ranking mechanisms, the system achieves superior classification accuracy that exceeds the performance of individual models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If multiple predictor models are trained and combined, then the classification accuracy improves, but the training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by training multiple predictor models and confidence models in advance during the training phase. These pre-trained models are then ready for rapid inference during deployment, where the ensemble confidence model can quickly aggregate their predictions without requiring additional real-time training computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The confidence models serve as intermediaries that evaluate and weight the predictions from multiple predictor models. This intermediary layer enables the system to efficiently combine multiple predictions by using confidence scores to prioritize reliable predictions, reducing the computational burden of processing all predictions equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If confidence models are trained to evaluate predictor model outputs, then the reliability of classifications improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoidmodel architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The confidence models serve multiple functions: they evaluate the reliability of predictor model predictions, provide weighting factors for aggregation, and contribute to the overall ensemble decision-making process. This multi-functionality allows the system to improve reliability without adding separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The confidence models provide feedback mechanisms by evaluating the quality of predictions from predictor models and adjusting the aggregation process accordingly. This feedback loop enables the ensemble confidence model to dynamically weight predictions based on their reliability, improving overall classification trustworthiness while maintaining a manageable architecture through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12561619B2Training ensemble predictor machine learning models with aggregated classes ranked by predictions and confidences utilizing plurality of training data items
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 INTUIT INC
  • US12561619B2 patent drawing
  • US12561619B2 patent drawing
  • US12561619B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method including training predictor machine learning models (MLMs) using a first data set. The trained predictor MLMs are trained to predict classifications of data items in the first data set. The method also includes training confidence MLMs using second classifications, output by the trained predictor MLMs. The method also includes generating an aggregated ranked list of classes based on third classifications output by the trained predictor MLMs and second confidences output by the trained confidence MLMs. The method also includes training an ensemble confidence MLM using the aggregated ranked list of classes to generate a trained ensemble confidence MLM. The trained ensemble confidence MLM is trained to predict a corresponding selected classification for each corresponding data item in a training data set containing second data items similar to the first data items.