Ensemble Prediction Model for Stuck Pipe Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software tools for predicting stuck pipe events in drilling operations are unreliable due to their reliance on human prediction, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies in drilling operations.

Innovation Solution

An ensemble of machine-learning algorithms, including neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and Bayesian methods, is used to predict the probability of stuck pipe events by analyzing real-time and historical drilling parameters, providing a more accurate and automated prediction system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human prediction methods are used to predict stuck pipe events, then the system is simple to operate, but the prediction accuracy and reliability are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human expert judgment and manual analysis with automated machine learning algorithms. Multiple ML models (neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and Bayesian methods) are trained on historical drilling data to automatically predict stuck pipe events, eliminating reliance on human prediction while significantly improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs an ensemble prediction model that combines multiple different machine learning algorithms rather than relying on a single method. This composite approach integrates the strengths of various ML techniques (neural networks for pattern recognition, decision trees for interpretability, support vector machines for classification, and Bayesian methods for probability assessment) to achieve superior prediction reliability compared to individual models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If existing software tools are used for prediction, then the implementation is straightforward, but the prediction accuracy is low leading to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple machine learning algorithms into a unified ensemble prediction system. By combining the outputs of neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and Bayesian methods, the system achieves higher prediction accuracy and reduces false positives compared to any single algorithm, while maintaining a coherent integrated framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ensemble prediction model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it performs classification (stuck vs. not stuck), provides probability estimates, identifies risk factors, and can adapt to different drilling scenarios. This multi-functionality is achieved through the diverse combination of ML algorithms, each contributing different analytical capabilities to the same prediction task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If manual prediction methods are used, then the computational resources required are minimal, but the time cost for analysis and response is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling operation efficiencyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning models are trained in advance on historical drilling data containing patterns leading up to stuck pipe events. This preliminary training phase enables the system to perform rapid real-time predictions during actual drilling operations without requiring time-consuming manual analysis, thus improving productivity while minimizing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction system operates autonomously by automatically ingesting real-time drilling parameters, processing them through the trained ensemble model, and generating predictions without human intervention. This self-service capability eliminates the time loss associated with manual data analysis and enables immediate response to potential stuck pipe events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8752648B2Method and system for predicting a drill string stuck pipe event
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • US8752648B2 patent drawing
  • US8752648B2 patent drawing
  • US8752648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Predicting a drill string stuck pipe event. At least some of the illustrative embodiments are methods including: receiving a plurality of drilling parameters from a drilling operation; applying the plurality of drilling parameters to an ensemble prediction model comprising at least three machine-learning algorithms operated in parallel, each machine-learning algorithm predicting a probability of occurrence of a future stuck pipe event based on at least one of the plurality of drilling parameters, the ensemble prediction model creates a combined probability based on the probability of occurrence of the future stuck pipe event of each machine-learning algorithm; and providing an indication of a likelihood of a future stuck pipe event to a drilling operator, the indication based on the combined probability.