Enterprise Application Adoption System with Dynamic Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Converting software applications in an enterprise setting is costly and disruptive due to significant resource investment and lost productivity as employees learn new systems, with the availability of legacy applications delaying the transition to new ones.

Innovation Solution

An adoption system that enforces an application upgrade path using user usage statistics and heuristics, monitoring user behavior to provide support measures such as forced execution of the updated application, tutorials, reminders, and notifications, while allowing phased transition from legacy to replacement applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If employees are allowed to use both legacy and replacement applications for a prolonged period, then productivity is maintained, but the time taken to learn the new system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidtime taken to learn new system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides tutorials, help screens, and notifications before the legacy application is completely removed, preparing employees in advance for the transition. This preliminary educational action reduces the learning time required when switching to the new application while maintaining productivity during the transition period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors user behavior and provides feedback through notifications and reminders that track adoption progress. This feedback mechanism encourages employees to transition to the replacement application by highlighting their progress and providing targeted support based on individual usage patterns, thereby accelerating learning without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If rapid switchover from legacy application to new application is implemented, then learning time is reduced, but lost productivity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning timeVSAvoidlost productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The transition period is segmented into phases with different enforcement levels. Initially, the system allows dual application usage with monitoring, then progressively enforces replacement application usage as employees demonstrate competency. This segmented approach enables controlled transition that minimizes both learning time and productivity loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Tutorials and help resources are made available before the mandatory switch occurs, allowing employees to prepare in advance. This preliminary preparation enables faster adoption without requiring abrupt switching, thereby reducing both learning time and productivity disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If enforcement measures are applied to force application adoption, then adoption speed increases, but employee resistance and disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadoption speedVSAvoidemployee resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The adoption enforcement is dynamic rather than static, adjusting based on individual employee progress and behavior. The system provides graduated enforcement starting with gentle reminders and progressing to mandatory enforcement only when necessary. This dynamic approach accelerates adoption while minimizing resistance by meeting employees where they are in their learning journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Continuous monitoring of user behavior provides real-time feedback that enables personalized enforcement strategies. Employees who demonstrate proficiency receive reduced enforcement, while those who struggle receive additional support. This feedback-driven dynamic enforcement increases adoption speed while reducing overall resistance by avoiding unnecessary coercion of competent users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9141384B2System and method for enforcing application adoption
Publication Date: 2015.09.22 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US9141384B2 patent drawing
  • US9141384B2 patent drawing
  • US9141384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes determining that a legacy application is executing on a client device. When the legacy application is open in the client device, an adoption rule is applied, wherein the adoption rule defines an instance in which a user is required to use a replacement application instead of the legacy application. When it is determined that the adoption rule is satisfied, the replacement application is executed and use of the legacy application is prevented.