Enterprise Language Model Training With Balanced Data Blending

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning models face challenges in effectively processing multi-modal inputs that combine natural language and structured data due to the complexity of interpreting natural language, leading to increased resource utilization and minimal predictive performance improvements.

Innovation Solution

A domain-specific language model is trained using a balanced training dataset that combines enterprise and domain-specific text partitions, generating semantically dense embeddings to complement structured inputs, thereby improving predictive performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If natural language inputs are used in machine learning models, then the model can process unstructured text data, but the complexity of interpreting natural language increases resource utilization and limits effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to process natural languageVSAvoidcomplexity of interpreting natural language
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an enterprise-specific language model as an intermediary component between raw natural language text and the predictive machine learning model. This language model processes and transforms unstructured text into structured representations (embeddings, extracted entities, relationships) that are easier for the predictive model to interpret, thereby reducing the complexity burden while maintaining natural language processing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the natural language processing task into distinct components: (1) enterprise-specific language model training phase, (2) text feature extraction phase, and (3) predictive modeling phase. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multi-modal inputs combining natural language with structured data are used, then predictive performance may improve, but processing and memory resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive performanceVSAvoidprocessing and memory resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant and non-redundant features from natural language text using the enterprise-specific language model. Instead of feeding entire text documents or all possible text features to the predictive model, the system extracts key entities, relationships, and semantic representations, thereby reducing resource consumption while maintaining predictive performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms natural language text from its original high-dimensional, unstructured form into compressed semantic representations (embeddings) with optimized dimensionality. This parameter transformation reduces the computational burden on the predictive model while preserving the essential information needed for accurate predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If traditional language modeling is used to extract text sequences, then text features can be obtained, but enterprise-level language models are lacking and much information is redundant with structured data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetext information extractionVSAvoidlack of enterprise-level language models
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a preliminary action by training an enterprise-specific language model before the predictive modeling phase. This pre-trained language model captures domain-specific terminology, relationships, and patterns that are unique to the enterprise context, ensuring that subsequent text feature extraction is both informative and non-redundant with respect to structured data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the enterprise-specific language model is trained using labeled data that reflects the actual relationships between text features and target predictions. This feedback loop ensures that the language model learns to extract features that are genuinely useful for prediction while avoiding redundancy with structured data inputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260017522A1Enterprise-specific language model training techniques
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 OPTUM INC
  • US20260017522A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017522A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017522A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide a language model training technique. The language model training technique may include a data blending preprocessing step to improve the performance of the language model at an enterprise level. The data blending technique includes receiving an enterprise data partition from a plurality of enterprise data partitions associated with an enterprise data source, receiving a domain-specific data partition from a plurality of domain-specific data partitions associated with one or more domain data sources that are different than the enterprise data source, storing the enterprise data partition as an initial training partition of a plurality of balanced training partitions within a balanced training dataset, and generating a balanced training partition by appending a portion of the domain-specific data partition to the initial training partition. A domain-specific language model may then be trained based on the balanced training dataset.