Centralized Entitlement Control for SoD Conflict Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise IT infrastructures face challenges in managing access permissions, leading to inconsistent entitlement structures, excessive permissions, and administrative burdens, which expose systems to security vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

A centralized, automated access control system that uses a uniform LDAP-based naming convention and a Separation of Duty (SoD) server to dynamically manage and monitor entitlements, detect conflicts, and enforce security policies in real-time, integrating with Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) for compliance and auditability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual access control methods are used, then administrative flexibility is maintained, but administrative burden and inconsistency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdministrative flexibilityVSAvoidAdministrative burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service through the TAC server that automatically creates, maps, and manages entitlements without requiring manual administrative intervention. The automated entitlement management system provisions access rights automatically based on user roles and IT asset requirements, eliminating the need for manual permission configuration while maintaining administrative control through centralized governance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical access control processes with an automated electronic system. The TAC server uses software-based entitlement management to substitute manual permission assignment, while the SoD server uses automated conflict detection algorithms to replace manual audit processes. This substitution eliminates repetitive manual tasks while maintaining security through electronic enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If excessive permissions are granted to ensure access, then operational efficiency improves, but security vulnerabilities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveOperational efficiencyVSAvoidSecurity vulnerabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by granting only the minimum necessary permissions through precise entitlement mapping. Instead of excessive broad permissions, the TAC server maps specific user roles to specific IT asset entitlements, providing just enough access for operational needs. The SoD server further refines this by detecting and preventing excessive or conflicting permissions that could create security vulnerabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The SoD server implements continuous feedback by monitoring entitlement assignments in real-time and comparing them against defined conflict rules. When potential excessive permissions or conflicts are detected, the system provides feedback to administrators and automatically adjusts entitlements to eliminate security vulnerabilities while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If centralized access control is implemented, then security and consistency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccess control consistencyVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the access control system into distinct functional components: the TAC server for entitlement creation and mapping, the SoD server for conflict detection and prevention, and the IGA system for governance and auditing. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks independently, improving reliability through specialized functionality while managing overall system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The TAC server serves multiple functions including creating entitlements, mapping users to assets, enforcing policies, and integrating with IGA systems. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single unified platform, improving consistency across the enterprise while managing complexity through integration rather than proliferation of separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If automated entitlement management is implemented, then administrative overhead is reduced, but initial system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdministrative efficiencyVSAvoidInitial system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-defining conflict rules, entitlement templates, and mapping configurations before actual access control operations begin. The SoD server is pre-configured with conflict detection criteria, and the TAC server has pre-established entitlement frameworks. This preliminary setup eliminates the need for complex real-time decision-making during operations, reducing administrative overhead while managing initial complexity through pre-planned configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12526325B1Centralized technology access control
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 MORGAN STANLEY SERVICES GROUP INC
  • US12526325B1 patent drawing
  • US12526325B1 patent drawing
  • US12526325B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented systems and methods monitor and control entitlements for IT assets in an enterprises system based on separation of duty conflict rules. The system may determine whether existing entitlements or a requested entitlement violates the conflict rules and perform an entitlement conflict remediation action. The entitlement conflict remediation action may include automatically revoking one or more entitlements or temporally approving one or more entitlements that violate the conflict rules.