Entitlement Evaluation Keys for Faster Access Rights Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital rights management systems are resource-heavy due to the need for frequent evaluations of access rights for multiple service providers and entitlement packages associated with a single content asset.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation of an evaluation key to represent the determination of access rights, allowing subsequent requests to utilize this key for efficient access control, thereby reducing redundant evaluations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If access rights are evaluated fresh for each content request, then access control accuracy is improved, but processing time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of access rights and stores the results in an evaluation key before actual content requests occur. This preliminary action allows subsequent requests to reuse the pre-computed evaluation results, avoiding redundant processing while maintaining accurate access control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the access determination in the form of an evaluation key that can be reused for multiple requests. Instead of re-evaluating the entire rights package each time, the system copies the evaluation result and applies it to subsequent content requests, significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If access rights are evaluated for multiple service providers, then access control accuracy is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the evaluation results from multiple service providers into a single evaluation key. By combining the access determinations from different providers and storing them in one unified key structure, the system enables efficient reuse across requests without needing to re-process each provider's rights separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation key serves multiple functions: it represents access determinations from multiple service providers, enables reuse across different content requests, and provides a universal interface for access control decisions. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate processing for each provider and request.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If fresh evaluation is performed for each request, then access control accuracy is improved, but processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by storing the evaluation key results and using them in subsequent requests. The feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from previous evaluations and reuse those results, improving processing efficiency while maintaining accurate access control through the stored evaluation information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12476971B2Systems and methods for entitlement management
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT LLC
  • US12476971B2 patent drawing
  • US12476971B2 patent drawing
  • US12476971B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for managing data are disclosed. One method can comprise receiving a first request for a service, wherein the first request is associated with a first rights package. The first rights package can be processed to determine access to the service. An evaluation key can be generated, wherein the evaluation key represents the determination of access relating to the processing of the first rights package. A second request for a service can be received, wherein the second request is associated with a second rights package. The second rights package can be processed using the evaluation key.