Ranking Entity Facets via User-Click Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engine information management systems face challenges in efficiently ranking entity facets for user queries due to the vast and dynamic nature of online information, where relevance is difficult to determine effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method that utilizes user-click feedback to rank entity facets by extracting statistical features from information corpora, such as query logs and user-generated content, and employing machine-learning techniques like stochastic gradient boosted decision trees to predict click-through rates, thereby enhancing the relevance and usability of search results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional search engine ranking methods are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the relevance and accuracy of search results deteriorates due to the vast and dynamic nature of online information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance determination accuracyVSAvoidranking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by collecting user-click data from search queries and using this feedback to continuously retrain and update the machine learning models. The system monitors user interactions with search results and adjusts ranking parameters based on actual user behavior, creating a closed-loop system that improves relevance determination over time while managing complexity through iterative refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing statistical features from information corpora, query logs, and user-generated content before they are needed for ranking. Machine learning models are trained in advance on historical data, and ranking parameters are pre-computed and cached, allowing the system to quickly adapt to new information without recalculating everything from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If user-click feedback is collected and processed, then the ranking relevance improves, but the data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacet ranking accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and stores statistical features from information corpora, query logs, and user-generated content in advance, before they are needed for actual ranking operations. This pre-processing includes computing co-occurrence statistics, term frequencies, and other relevant metrics, which are then readily available for rapid model training and ranking updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The data processing pipeline is segmented into distinct modular stages: feature extraction from various corpora, statistical computation, model training, and ranking generation. Each stage can be independently optimized and executed in parallel where possible, reducing overall processing time while maintaining the ability to handle large volumes of user-click feedback data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If machine learning techniques are employed to predict click-through rates, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the computational complexity and resource requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclick-through rate prediction accuracyVSAvoidmachine learning model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies machine learning techniques selectively to the most important and difficult-to-rank facets, rather than attempting to perfectly rank all facets. For less critical facets, simpler ranking rules or heuristics are used. This partial application of complex ML methods achieves sufficient prediction accuracy for the most valuable ranking decisions while avoiding the excessive computational overhead of applying sophisticated models uniformly across all facets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9262532B2Ranking entity facets using user-click feedback
Publication Date: 2016.02.16 R2 SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US9262532B2 patent drawing
  • US9262532B2 patent drawing
  • US9262532B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example methods, apparatuses, or articles of manufacture are disclosed that may be implemented using one or more computing devices to facilitate or otherwise support one or more processes or operations associated with ranking entity facets using user-click feedback.