Entity Mapping via Hash Clustering and Confidence Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for linking online information cards to social profiles of notable entities are inefficient due to manual editorial work and high false negatives, especially when dealing with large datasets from open knowledge databases like Wikipedia, which are not easily scalable.

Innovation Solution

A method involving filtering social data from open knowledge databases, clustering and classifying it using a hash function, and post-processing to automatically map facts to social profiles, reducing ambiguity and improving scalability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual editorial work is used to prepare online electronic information cards and link web-based pages to social profiles, then the accuracy of entity mapping is improved, but the productivity and scalability of the system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity mapping accuracyVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic entity mapping by having the algorithm self-correct through iterative refinement. The self-service mechanism uses confidence scoring and automatic retry logic to resolve ambiguities without human intervention, allowing the system to scale while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where mapping results are evaluated against confidence thresholds, and ambiguous cases are automatically retried or flagged for review. This feedback mechanism continuously improves mapping accuracy while maintaining high throughput by only requiring manual review for edge cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If all data entities are loaded in the pipeline without prior filtering, then the completeness of data processing is improved, but the loss of time and computational resources deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering of data entities before main processing by applying confidence thresholds and pre-computed filters. This preliminary action eliminates obviously incorrect or low-value entities early in the pipeline, reducing processing time while preserving all potentially valid candidates for further analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The data processing pipeline is segmented into multiple stages: initial filtering, confidence-based selection, detailed processing, and post-processing refinement. Each stage handles specific types of entities with appropriate complexity, preventing unnecessary processing of all entities uniformly and reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If a classifier makes a final judgment call on entity identity, then the decision speed is improved, but the reliability of entity mapping deteriorates due to high false negatives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision speedVSAvoidentity mapping reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic confidence thresholds that adjust based on entity characteristics and context. Rather than a static classifier decision, the system adaptively determines when additional verification is needed, balancing speed and reliability by processing high-confidence cases quickly while applying more rigorous checks to ambiguous cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary confidence assessment and filtering before final classification. By pre-computing similarity scores and filtering obvious matches early, the system reduces the burden on the final classifier, improving both its speed and accuracy by focusing computational resources on challenging cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If automated filtering and clustering is used to process social data, then the productivity and scalability are improved, but the manufacturing precision of entity mapping deteriorates due to ambiguous results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing scalabilityVSAvoidmapping accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual editorial review with automated algorithms that use confidence scoring, clustering, and similarity computation. This substitution maintains high productivity while improving precision through consistent, reproducible automated decisions that can be refined through iterative processing and confidence-based filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10846310B2Method and system for mapping notable entities to their social profiles
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US10846310B2 patent drawing
  • US10846310B2 patent drawing
  • US10846310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for mapping entities to social profile data. Social data regarding an entity (e.g., a notable entity, celebrity, movie, famous brand, etc.) is filtered from one or more open knowledge databases to produce filtered social data regarding the entity (or entities). The filtered social data is clustered and classified with respect to the entity according to a hash function to produce candidate results related to the entity. Ambiguous results are then filtered out from the candidate results, thereby automatically mapping facts contained in one or more of the open knowledge databases to a social profile associated with the entity.