Entity Resolution via Image Representation Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Service providers face challenges in automating entity resolution for content metadata from diverse sources, as existing methods require large amounts of training data and manual processes to accurately identify and unify metadata instances referring to the same entity, due to variations in text formats and sparse training data.

Innovation Solution

A system converts content metadata into a unified image format using an image generator, which is then compared using a prediction network to determine similarity with candidate metadata images, eliminating the need for manual processes and improving accuracy by analyzing visual representations rather than textual data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a model is used to analyze text from metadata instances, then entity resolution can be automated, but the model requires large amounts of training data that are not available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity resolution automationVSAvoidtraining data quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary representation (image encoding) that mediates between the text descriptions and the comparison process. Instead of directly comparing text or training a model on text variations, the system converts text descriptions into image representations, which serve as an intermediary form that can be compared using image similarity techniques, bypassing the need for large text training datasets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the text analysis mechanical system (NLP models requiring extensive training) with an image-based mechanical system. By converting text descriptions into image representations and using image comparison algorithms, the system substitutes the complex text processing mechanism with a different domain approach that doesn't require the same amount of training data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If text variations in metadata are analyzed directly, then entity resolution accuracy can be improved, but the complexity of handling diverse text formats increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity resolution accuracyVSAvoidtext format processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter domain from text to image representations. By transforming text descriptions into image encodings, the system changes the fundamental parameter space in which comparisons are made, allowing accuracy improvements while avoiding the complexity of directly processing diverse text formats and variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual processes are used for entity resolution, then accuracy can be maintained, but the productivity and speed of metadata processing decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity resolution accuracyVSAvoidmetadata processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service automated system that performs entity resolution without manual intervention. The system automatically converts text descriptions to image representations, compares them using similarity algorithms, and resolves entities, thereby maintaining accuracy through systematic processing while dramatically improving productivity and speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11481570B2Entity resolution for text descriptions using image comparison
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 HULU LLC
  • US11481570B2 patent drawing
  • US11481570B2 patent drawing
  • US11481570B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a method receives a first textual description of content and converts the first textual description of content to a first image representation. The method compares a similarity between the first image representation and a second image representation for candidate metadata. The candidate metadata is associated with a second textual description of content. The method determines whether the first textual description of content is associated with the second textual description of content based on the comparison of similarity of the first image representation and the second image representation.