Automated Entity Selection Tool for SaaS Platform Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manually evaluating potential relationships and computing platforms for Software as a Service (SaaS) application development is time-consuming and error-prone, leading to costly mistakes and reputation damage for enterprises.

Innovation Solution

An automated entity selection tool platform that uses a computer server to retrieve and evaluate electronic records from use case and quality function deployment data stores, constructing computer system configurations, assigning weighted score values, and automatically selecting the most suitable entity based on scoring matrices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual evaluation of potential relationships and computing platforms is performed, then flexibility and human judgment are maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical evaluation process with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to evaluate entities against predefined criteria. The system automatically retrieves entity information, compares it against requirements, and generates evaluation results without human intervention in the actual evaluation steps, thereby eliminating time consumption and human error while maintaining evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is designed to autonomously perform the entire evaluation process without requiring human operators. The computer system self-retrieves data, self-evaluates entities against criteria, and self-generates results, making the process efficient and error-free while preserving the flexibility of customizable evaluation parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual RFP evaluation and entity assessment are conducted, then detailed analysis is possible, but misunderstandings and errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual evaluation processes with a standardized automated system that eliminates misunderstandings. The computer system interprets requirements and evaluates entities consistently according to predefined criteria, removing human subjectivity and communication errors while maintaining reliable and reproducible evaluation results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the evaluation process from a complex qualitative human judgment process into a structured quantitative comparison. By converting evaluation criteria into measurable parameters and using algorithmic processing, the system simplifies the complexity while improving reliability through consistent application of evaluation standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If traditional entity selection methods are used, then human expertise is applied, but costly mistakes and reputation damage can occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity assessment accuracyVSAvoidselection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual entity assessment with an automated computer-based evaluation system that provides precise and efficient selection. The system accurately compares entities against requirements using standardized criteria while dramatically improving selection efficiency through automated processing, thereby preventing costly mistakes without sacrificing the benefits of expert-level assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11748367B2Entity selection tool system and method
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
  • US11748367B2 patent drawing
  • US11748367B2 patent drawing
  • US11748367B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer server may receive an indication of a selected potential relationship and retrieve, from a use case configuration data store, an electronic record for that relationship. The first entity may then construct computer system configurations in accordance with use case parameters. The computer server may be used to evaluate the constructed computer system configurations, and an entity score result for the first entity may be stored into the use case configuration data store. The computer server may also retrieve, from a quality function deployment data store, an electronic record associated with the first entity and update a uniform scoring matrix by assigning weighted score values for the first entity in connection with a set of platform capabilities. An entity selection tool may be executed to automatically select a recommended entity based on the score results and scoring matrixes, and an indication of the recommended entity may be transmitted.