Entity State Verification for Concurrent Asynchronous Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for verifying state-quantity values in asynchronous operations are inefficient, unreliable, and error-prone, particularly when multiple operations attempt to modify values simultaneously, leading to race conditions and unpredictable behavior.

Innovation Solution

An entity state unifier is utilized to verify proposed state-quantity values based on available values from an entity object, providing a trusted source for state-quantity values associated with an entity's lifecycle, ensuring uniform and reliable verification of asynchronous operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If asynchronous operations are used to allow concurrent operations, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to race conditions and unpredictable behavior when multiple operations modify values simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrent operation executionVSAvoidstate-quantity value consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification mechanism that checks proposed state-quantity values against available values before operations are executed. This mediator prevents direct conflicts between concurrent operations by validating state transitions, thereby maintaining reliability while preserving asynchronous productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by verifying proposed state-quantity values against current available values and using this information to determine whether operations can proceed. This feedback loop ensures consistent state management across concurrent operations, resolving the reliability issue without sacrificing concurrency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If existing verification techniques are used for state-quantity values, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability and measurement precision deteriorate due to inefficiency and error-proneness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidverification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces existing mechanical verification approaches with a more robust system that uses available state-quantity values as a trusted reference. This substitution eliminates errors in verification while maintaining operational simplicity, as the system automatically compares proposed values against the trusted available values without complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If multiple asynchronous operations modify values simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to race conditions and unpredictable behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrent operation executionVSAvoidstate-quantity value accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of proposed state-quantity values against available values before allowing operations to execute. This preliminary action ensures that state transitions are valid and prevents race conditions, maintaining measurement precision while enabling concurrent operations to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250390336A1Methods and systems to verify entity state-quantity values for asynchronous operations
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 STRIPE LLC
  • US20250390336A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390336A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390336A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are methods and system for improved entity state-quantity value verification for asynchronous operations. In one example, a request for an asynchronous operation corresponding to an entity object may be identified. The entity object may include a set of state-quantity values and each state-quantity value may include a quantity associated with a possible stage in a lifecycle of the corresponding entity. A proposed state-quantity value may be determined based on the request for the asynchronous operation corresponding to the entity object. Additionally, an available state-quantity value may be generated based on at least a portion of the set of state-quantity values of the entity object. The asynchronous operation may be performed when a condition based on the proposed state-quantity value and the available state-quantity value is satisfied.