Environmental Project Recommendation System Using Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in measuring, tracking, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in identifying effective environmental projects that consider their own performance and the impact on their supply chain.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that identifies a group of organizations for an organization of interest using organization parameters, determines environmental performance for these organizations using environmental data, and recommends a set of environmental projects tailored to the organization of interest while minimizing negative impacts on its supply chain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If environmental projects are recommended based on general environmental performance data, then the recommendation process is simple, but the accuracy and relevance of recommendations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of environmental project recommendationsVSAvoidcomplexity of environmental performance analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments organizations into groups based on similar environmental performance characteristics and industry sectors. By dividing the large population of organizations into smaller, homogeneous groups, the system can provide more accurate and relevant environmental project recommendations tailored to each group's specific needs and challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer that processes environmental performance data, identifies patterns, and matches organizations with appropriate environmental projects. This intermediary processing step bridges the gap between raw environmental data and actionable recommendations, improving accuracy without requiring direct complex analysis of all possible project combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If environmental projects are selected without considering supply chain impact, then the project selection process is fast, but negative impacts on supply chain partners increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of environmental project implementationVSAvoidnegative impact on supply chain environmental performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of supply chain relationships and potential environmental impacts before finalizing project recommendations. By assessing supply chain effects in advance, the system can identify and adjust project selections to avoid negative impacts on partners while maintaining implementation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that consider the environmental performance impacts on supply chain partners when evaluating project recommendations. This feedback loop allows the system to iteratively refine project selections to balance implementation speed with positive supply chain outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If detailed environmental performance analysis is conducted for all organizations, then recommendation accuracy improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of environmental performance measurementVSAvoidtime required for environmental performance analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the analysis process by first grouping organizations into categories based on industry, size, and environmental performance characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to apply detailed analysis only to relevant groups rather than processing all organizations uniformly, reducing overall processing time while maintaining precision for targeted analyses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial detailed analysis to the most critical organizations and projects, while using simplified methods for less critical cases. This selective approach ensures high precision where needed most while minimizing unnecessary computational resources and time spent on less important analyses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12321878B2Net zero acceleration for organizations
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12321878B2 patent drawing
  • US12321878B2 patent drawing
  • US12321878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method identifies a set of environmental projects. A number of processor units identifies a group in a plurality of groups for organization of interest using organization parameters for the organization of interest. The number of processor units determines environmental performance for the organizations in the group using environmental data and the organization parameters for the organizations in the group. The number of processor units identifies the set of environmental projects for the organization of interest based on the environmental performance determined for the organizations in the group.