Enzymatic Hydrolysis pH Adjustment for Lignocellulosic Slurry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost of enzymes and low efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis in converting lignocellulosic materials to sugars hinder the commercialization of biofuels, as existing methods are inefficient and costly, especially due to inhibitor effects in pretreatment liquids.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials to achieve a slurry with a pH of less than 6, followed by alkaline treatment with NaOH, Ca(OH)2, or CaO to increase pH to at least 8, and subsequent reduction of pH to below 7, before adding hydrolytic enzymes for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis, which can be performed at elevated temperatures to reduce base usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dilute acid hydrolysis pretreatment is used to improve cellulose accessibility, then enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency is improved, but the pretreatment liquid contains inhibitors that reduce saccharification yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzymatic hydrolysis efficiencyVSAvoidinhibitor effects in pretreatment liquid
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies alkaline treatment to convert the harmful acidic inhibitors in the pretreatment liquid into beneficial effects. The alkali neutralizes the acid and simultaneously improves cellulose accessibility to enzymes, transforming the harmful acidic environment into a favorable condition for enzymatic hydrolysis. This resolves the contradiction by using the alkaline treatment to eliminate inhibitors while maintaining high saccharification yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Productivity

If surfactants are added to prevent unproductive enzyme binding, then enzymatic saccharification is improved, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzymatic saccharification efficiencyVSAvoidenzyme dosage and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the reaction medium by adjusting pH through alkaline treatment. This parameter change improves enzyme accessibility to cellulose and reduces unproductive binding without requiring additional surfactant additives. The pH adjustment alone achieves the desired improvement in saccharification efficiency, thereby reducing enzyme dosage requirements and production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If high solids concentration is used in industrial processes, then production capacity is improved, but inhibitor effects in pretreatment liquid become more significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidinhibitor concentration in slurry
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies alkaline treatment to the high solids concentration slurry, converting the harmful acidic inhibitors into neutralized compounds. This treatment improves cellulose accessibility and maintains high solids concentration, thereby preserving production capacity while eliminating inhibitor effects. The alkaline treatment enables effective enzymatic hydrolysis even at high solids concentrations that would otherwise be inhibited by acidic compounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly improves the saccharification yield by up to 25% compared to untreated conditions, reducing enzyme requirements and increasing production capacity, thus lowering costs and enhancing the efficiency of biofuel production.

Implementation Method 1

adding NaOH, Ca(OH)2 and/or CaO to the slurry to increase its pH to at least 8

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAlkaline treatment:

Implementation Method 2

adding hydrolytic enzymes to the slurry from c) and allowing the slurry to hydrolyze

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic hydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 3

The addition of enzymes constitutes a considerable part of the total cost for the process of producing products from lignocellulosic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 4

The polysaccharides can be hydrolyzed to sugars and converted to various fermentation products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 5

the hemicellulose is degraded and the cellulose is made increasingly accessible to cellulolytic enzymes or acidic hydrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcid-catalyzed hydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS9512454B2Methods for improvement of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellullosic material
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 SEKAB E TECHNOLOGY AB
  • US9512454B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method of enzymatic hydrolysis of a lignocellulosic material, comprising the steps of: a) pretreating the lignocellulosic material to obtain a slurry having a pH of less than 6; b) adding NaOH, Ca(OH)2 and/or CaO to the slurry to increase its pH to at least 8, said addition being carried out at a slurry temperature of at least 60° C.; c) reducing the pH of the slurry to below 7; and optionally cooling the slurry from step b) to a temperature below 60° C.; and d) adding hydrolytic enzymes to the slurry from c) and allowing the slurry to hydrolyze wherein no washing of the slurry is performed prior to step d).