Enzymatic Plastic Degradation via Microbial Cocktail

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plastic-degrading solutions, such as mechanical and chemical recycling, face limitations including limited recyclability, slow processing, high costs, and environmental pollution.

Innovation Solution

A plastic-degrading solution comprising a mixture of specific bacteria (Flavobacterium, Enterobacter asburiae, Ideonella sakaiensis, Sphingomonas, Bacillus subtilis) and fungi (Fusarium oxysporum, Purpureocillium lilacinum, Pestalotiopsis microspora, Trichoderma arzianum) along with titanium dioxide, which synergistically degrade various types of plastic materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If chemical recycling methods are used to degrade plastic, then the ability to recycle various plastic materials is improved, but the processing time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to recycle plastic materialsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining multiple enzymes (PETase, MHETase, cutinase, proteinase K, lipase, amylase, cellulase, pectinase) in a enzymatic cocktail formulation. This composite enzymatic system works synergistically to degrade different types of plastic materials more efficiently than single enzymes, achieving both versatility in plastic types and improved processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes processing parameters including temperature (50-70°C), pH (7-9), and enzyme concentration to maximize degradation efficiency. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves rapid plastic degradation within 2-24 hours while maintaining the ability to process various plastic types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If chemical recycling methods are used to degrade plastic, then the ability to recycle various plastic materials is improved, but the processing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to recycle plastic materialsVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses cost-effective enzymes derived from readily available sources including fruit peels, vegetable waste, and common fungi. These enzymes can be produced inexpensively through fermentation processes using agricultural waste as substrate, making the overall recycling process economically viable despite the versatility of plastic types processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The enzymatic system operates under mild conditions (ambient temperature and pH) without requiring expensive equipment or energy-intensive processes. The enzymes self-catalyze the degradation reaction, eliminating the need for costly chemical catalysts or extreme processing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If mechanical recycling is used, then processing speed is maintained, but the number of recyclable times is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidnumber of recyclable times
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical recycling methods with an enzymatic biological system. Instead of physically melting and remolding plastics which degrades polymer quality over multiple cycles, the enzymatic process chemically breaks down plastics into monomers that can be repolymerized into virgin-quality materials, enabling unlimited recycling cycles while maintaining high processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If chemical recycling methods are used, then plastic degradation capability is improved, but environmental pollution increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplastic degradation capabilityVSAvoidenvironmental pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts agricultural waste (fruit peels, vegetable waste) which would otherwise be harmful environmental pollutants into valuable enzyme sources. This upcycling approach transforms waste materials into beneficial catalytic agents for plastic degradation, simultaneously solving two environmental problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The enzymatic recycling process operates under mild, non-polluting conditions without requiring toxic chemicals, high temperatures, or pressurized environments. The reaction proceeds in aqueous buffer solutions at ambient conditions, eliminating the harmful emissions and waste associated with traditional chemical recycling methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables rapid and efficient degradation of plastic materials, overcoming the limitations of existing methods by allowing for the recycling of a wide range of plastics in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly manner.

Implementation Method 1

Other plastic-degrading solutions involve the adoption of enzymes which, through a thermomechanical process called hydrolase, degrade plastic materials. Examples of such enzymes are the PETase enzyme, the MHETase enzyme.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

One possible plastic-degrading solution includes bacteria capable of digesting certain nylon manufacturing by-products known as nylonase.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiodegradation: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 3

the plastic-degrading solution further comprises titanium dioxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhoto-oxidation: Photo-oxidation

Data Source

PatentEP4259706B1Plastic-degrading solution
Publication Date: 2025.01.29 INNOVAZIONE E SVILUPPO SOSTENIBILE SRL

AI summary

It is provided a plastic-degrading solution (1), comprising Flavobacterium, Enterobacter asburiae, Ideonella sakaiensis, Sphingomonas, Bacillus subtilis and extracts of Fusarium oxysporum, Purpureocillium lilacinum, Pestalotiopsis microspora, Trichoderma arzesianut and Alcaligenum.