Enzymatic Stereoisomer Separation at Lower Temperatures for Enzyme Reuse

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing enzymatic processes for the separation of (1R,2S)-2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine are limited by the longevity of enzymes due to high reaction temperatures, which lead to enzyme degradation and reduced cycle efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A process using Candida antarctica enzyme in the presence of a tertiary alcohol or aromatic hydrocarbon solvent, with acylating agents at lower temperatures, followed by hydrogenation and reaction with a base or acid to achieve high purity (1R,2S)-2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine, allowing multiple cycles without enzyme degradation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high reaction temperatures (55-130°C) are used for enzymatic acylation, then reaction rate and productivity are improved, but enzyme longevity and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidenzyme longevity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter from high (55-130°C) to low (20-50°C) to resolve the contradiction. This parameter change maintains enzyme stability and longevity while still achieving effective reaction rates through optimized catalyst loading and reaction time at the lower temperature range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements dynamic optimization by adjusting multiple parameters together: lower temperature (20-50°C) is combined with optimized enzyme loading (0.1-10 wt%) and extended reaction time (1-48 hours). This dynamic parameter optimization maintains productivity while preserving enzyme longevity for multiple reuse cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If the enzyme is reused for multiple cycles, then cost efficiency is improved, but enzyme activity and purity production deteriorate due to degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidpurity production
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter to a lower range (20-50°C) that preserves enzyme structure and activity across multiple cycles. This parameter change enables the enzyme to maintain its catalytic function and produce high purity (1R,2S)-2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine over extended reuse periods, thereby improving cost efficiency without sacrificing manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables continuous useful action by optimizing the enzyme reaction conditions for longevity. The enzyme can be reused for multiple cycles (at least 3-5 cycles demonstrated) with consistent high purity production, maintaining continuous productive action without significant loss of catalytic efficiency or product quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If reaction time is extended to improve separation completeness, then purity is improved, but enzyme degradation accelerates at high temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation completenessVSAvoidenzyme stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temperature parameter from high (55-130°C) to low (20-50°C), which fundamentally alters the degradation kinetics. At these lower temperatures, the enzyme remains stable even during extended reaction times (1-48 hours), allowing complete separation and high purity production without significant enzyme degradation or loss of reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process maintains enzyme integrity through lower reaction temperatures, enabling multiple cycles with high purity (1R,2S)-2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine production, addressing the longevity issue in existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

reaction of a mixture of the four isomers (1R,1R)-, (1S,2S)-, (1S,2R)- and (1R,2S)-2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine with an acylating agent of formula R-C(=O)OR 1Candida antarctica

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

step 3), and at least one step 4), said step 3) is the hydrogenation with a metal catalyst of the mixture of the three isomers (1R,1R)-, (1S,2S)- and (15,2R)-2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine obtained in step 2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentEP4692045A1Enzymatic process for the separation of 2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1h-inden-1-amine stereoisomers
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 ADAMA AGAN LTD
  • EP4692045A1 patent drawing
  • EP4692045A1 patent drawing
  • EP4692045A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An enzymatic process for the separation of isomers of 2,6-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine.