Enzyme-Activated Cross-Linking Compounds for Stable Nanostructures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for compounds and methods to cross-link nanostructures under physiological conditions for bioconjugation applications, as existing methods are limited.

Innovation Solution

Development of cross-linking compounds with specific structures (Formulas IA, IB, II, III, IV, and V) that can react enzymatically under physiological conditions, incorporating protecting groups, linkers, and functional groups to form stable cross-linked nanostructures for bioconjugation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing cross-linking methods are used under physiological conditions, then cross-linking can occur, but the stability and reliability of the cross-linked nanostructures are insufficient for bioconjugation applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of cross-linked nanostructuresVSAvoidlimitation of existing methods
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by utilizing enzyme-specific cleavage of protecting groups (PG) under physiological conditions. The cross-linking reaction is triggered by changing the chemical state from protected to deprotected form through enzymatic action, enabling reliable cross-linking in biological environments where previous methods failed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces enzyme-labile protecting groups as intermediaries between the cross-linking agent and the target nanostructures. These PG groups act as mediators that prevent premature cross-linking while enabling controlled activation by specific enzymes, thereby improving reliability without complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If cross-linking compounds are designed with multiple functional groups and protecting groups, then bioconjugation capability is enhanced, but the complexity of the compound structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebioconjugation capabilityVSAvoidcompound structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the cross-linking compound into distinct functional modules: a cross-linking core (Formula IA), multiple enzyme-labile protecting groups (PG), various linkers (L1, L2, L3), and bioconjugatable groups (Z). This modular segmentation allows independent optimization of each function while maintaining overall versatility for different bioconjugation applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves universality by designing a platform compound (Formula IA) that can accommodate multiple types of protecting groups, linkers, and bioconjugatable groups. This multi-functional design enables the same core structure to be adapted for various bioconjugation applications, enhancing versatility without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If enzyme-labile protecting groups are used to enable physiological cross-linking, then in vivo applicability is improved, but the duration of action and control precision become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvein vivo applicabilityVSAvoidcontrol precision of cross-linking timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses enzyme-labile protecting groups as intermediaries that provide temporal control over cross-linking activation. The specific enzyme-substrate recognition ensures that cross-linking occurs only when and where the target enzyme is present, improving in vivo applicability while maintaining control precision through biological specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by designing compounds where the protecting groups are automatically cleaved by endogenous enzymes at the target site. This self-activating mechanism eliminates the need for external activation systems, simplifying in vivo operation while maintaining precise spatial and temporal control through enzyme specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the formation of stable cross-linked nanostructures suitable for bioconjugation, facilitating targeted delivery and detection of cells, tissues, and agents, as well as therapeutic applications.

Implementation Method 1

each PG is a protecting group and each protecting group is independently an enzyme labile group (e.g., a glycosyl group, glucoside, glucuronide, galactosyl, phosphate (e.g., a phosphoester group) group, sulfoester group, β-lactam, phosphoramidate, group that is labile to peroxidases, and/or a self-immolative linker)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic hydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS12502440B2Cross-linking compounds and methods of use thereof
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV
  • US12502440B2 patent drawing
  • US12502440B2 patent drawing
  • US12502440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compounds of Formula IA, IB, II, III, IV, and/or V are described herein along with their methods of use. A compound of the present invention may cross-link under physiological conditions and/or in vivo.