End-of-Train Device Pressure Calibration Certification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual process of verifying the accuracy of end-of-train (EOT) device pressure transducers is prone to operator error and lacks reliability, requiring on-site inspections by FRA agents, which is inefficient and unreliable.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for certifying EOT device pressure calibration using a pressure calibration device that outputs a regulated air pressure, which is measured by the EOT device, with a controller determining a certification result based on the difference between the measured and regulated pressures, and transmitting this data to a remote server.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection process is used to verify EOT device pressure transducer accuracy, then operator flexibility and on-site assessment capability are maintained, but operator errors increase and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure measurement accuracy verificationVSAvoidinspection process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The EOT device performs self-diagnosis by automatically comparing its pressure transducer readings against a known good transducer within itself, eliminating the need for external manual inspection and reducing operator error while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automatic feedback by comparing pressure measurements from two transducers and generating pass/fail certification results, replacing manual assessment with automated decision-making that eliminates operator judgment errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If on-site manual inspection by FRA agents is required, then regulatory compliance is ensured, but inspection time and operational efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The EOT device performs preliminary self-certification before FRA inspection by automatically verifying its pressure transducer accuracy and storing certification results, so that when FRA agents inspect, the work is already done and they only need to verify the automated results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the certification process by automatically recording and storing pressure measurement data and certification results, replacing manual documentation and allowing remote verification without physical inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of information

If manual recordation and forms are used for EOT device inspection, then detailed documentation is captured, but data accuracy and trustworthiness are compromised due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection data accuracyVSAvoiddata recording process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical documentation processes with electronic automated data capture and storage, where pressure measurements and certification results are automatically recorded in digital form, eliminating transcription errors and improving data integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates accurate digital copies of inspection data directly from sensor readings, eliminating the need for manual transcription and ensuring that the recorded data exactly matches the actual measurements without human intervention errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a reliable, efficient, and automated method for certifying EOT device pressure calibration, reducing operator error and enabling remote verification, thus ensuring compliance with FRA regulations without the need for on-site inspections.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure sensing device configured to obtain a measured pressure by measuring the regulated pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS10094729B2System, method, and apparatus for certifying a brake pressure calibration for an end-of-train device
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 WABTEC HLDG CORP
  • US10094729B2 patent drawing
  • US10094729B2 patent drawing
  • US10094729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method, and apparatus for certifying an end-of-train device pressure calibration is provided. The system includes an end-of-train device including a brake pipe interface adapted to be removably connected to a brake pipe system of a train and to receive air having a pressure from the brake pipe system, and a pressure sensing device configured to measure the air pressure received in the brake pipe interface to obtain a measured pressure. The system also includes a pressure calibration device adapted to be removably connected to the brake pipe interface when the end-of-train device is removed from the train, the pressure calibration device configured to output air at a regulated pressure to the brake pipe interface, and at least one controller programmed or configured to determine a calibration certification result based at least partially on a difference between the measured pressure and the regulated pressure.