End-of-Train Unit Verification System for Brake Pipe Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current end-of-train units in trains require periodic calibration checks, leading to unnecessary downtime and expenses, even if the pressure transducer is functioning correctly, and railroads face penalties for non-compliance with mandated calibration schedules.

Innovation Solution

A verification system that includes multiple pressure sensors and a computer to monitor air pressure in the brake pipe, comparing data to determine variance and implementing actions such as maintenance logging or communication based on the results, allowing for condition-based maintenance rather than scheduled calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If periodic calibration checks are performed on end-of-train units, then compliance with FRA regulations is ensured, but operational downtime and expenses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with FRA regulationsVSAvoidoperational downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The end-of-train unit performs self-verification by comparing readings from the pressure transducer against readings from additional pressure sensors. This self-monitoring capability allows the unit to detect calibration drift and trigger maintenance only when necessary, eliminating the need for mandatory periodic removals and reducing operational downtime while maintaining compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by comparing pressure readings from the primary transducer with readings from additional sensors. When variance exceeds predetermined thresholds, the system generates alerts and logs maintenance requirements, enabling real-time monitoring and condition-based maintenance scheduling that reduces unnecessary downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If periodic calibration checks are performed on end-of-train units, then regulatory compliance is maintained, but operational expenses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidoperational expenses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The unit monitors its own calibration status through self-verification against additional sensors, generating maintenance alerts only when drift is detected. This eliminates unnecessary calibration expenses for units that remain accurate, reducing overall operational costs while maintaining compliance through continuous monitoring and timely maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the maintenance approach from time-based periodic calibration to condition-based calibration triggered by actual drift detection. By monitoring pressure reading variances and comparing them against predetermined thresholds, the system performs calibration only when the transducer actually requires it, reducing unnecessary expenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple pressure sensors are added for verification, then measurement accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reading accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Additional pressure sensors serve as intermediary verification devices that compare readings against the primary transducer. These sensors act as reference measurements to detect drift without requiring complex analysis, simply comparing pressure values and triggering alerts when variance exceeds thresholds, maintaining simplicity despite added components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system reduces operational expenses by ensuring maintenance is only performed when necessary, increasing the availability of end-of-train units and preventing penalties by accurately determining when recalibration is required.

Implementation Method 1

a first pressure sensor configured to monitor or sense the air pressure in a brake pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Data Source

PatentUS9616876B2Verification system and method for an end-of-train unit of a train and an improved end-of-train unit for a train
Publication Date: 2017.04.11 WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECH CORP
  • US9616876B2 patent drawing
  • US9616876B2 patent drawing
  • US9616876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A verification system for an end-of-train unit for a train having a first pressure sensor for determining the air pressure in a brake pipe, the system including: at least one additional pressure sensor to monitor or sense the air pressure in the brake pipe; and a computer to: receive or determine pressure data from the first pressure sensor; receive or determine pressure data from the at least one additional pressure sensor; compare the pressure data received or determined from the first pressure sensor with the pressure data received or determined from the at least one additional pressure sensor; and implement or facilitate an action based at least partially upon the results of the comparison. An improved end-of-train unit is also disclosed.