EP4 Receptor Antagonist Synthesis via D-Proline Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current EP4 receptor antagonists, such as CR6086, have complex synthetic routes that make them costly and time-consuming to produce, necessitating the development of simpler and more cost-effective alternatives for treating diseases associated with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) activity.

Innovation Solution

The development of (R)-4-(1-(1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl) pyrrolidin-2-carboxamide) cyclopropyl benzoic acid (Compound 1) and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, which are potent and selective antagonists of the EP4 receptor, using simplified synthesis processes involving D-proline and reduced step procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CR6086 is synthesized using the conventional 8-step route, then high affinity and selectivity for EP4 receptor is achieved, but the synthesis complexity and production cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEP4 receptor affinity and selectivityVSAvoidsynthesis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The synthesis is divided into modular stages: (a) amide bond formation between N-Boc-D-proline and methyl 4-(1-aminocyclopropyl) benzoate, (b) Boc group deprotection to reveal the amine, (c) alkylation with 4-trifluoromethyl benzyl bromide, and (d) ester hydrolysis. Each stage uses standardized reagents and conditions, reducing overall complexity while maintaining product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the starting material from complex spirocyclic structures to simple D-proline, and modifies reaction conditions to use commercially available reagents under mild conditions. This parameter change simplifies the synthesis pathway while preserving the critical pharmacophore features for EP4 receptor binding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If CR6086 is synthesized using the conventional 8-step route, then high affinity and selectivity for EP4 receptor is achieved, but production time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEP4 receptor affinity and selectivityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The synthesis plan is designed in advance with clearly defined intermediate structures and protected group strategies. The Boc protection group is strategically used to enable sequential reactions without side reactions, and each intermediate is designed to be easily purified. This preliminary planning reduces actual execution time and improves production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The synthesis pathway is designed to minimize idle time between reactions. Each step flows logically into the next, with intermediates that can be carried forward without extensive purification. The continuous transformation from simple starting materials to the final product maintains productive momentum throughout the synthesis sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If simpler synthesis routes are used for EP4 antagonists, then production cost and time are reduced, but the ability to effectively inhibit PGE2-mediated activities may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidPGE2 inhibition efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses inexpensive, commercially available starting materials like D-proline and standard reagents (EDC, HOBt, TFA) that can be readily obtained. These simple, disposable materials are transformed through efficient reactions to create the complex pharmacologically active compound, achieving cost reduction without sacrificing efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The critical pharmacophore elements (pyrrolidine ring, carboxamide group, cyclopropyl benzoic acid moiety, and trifluoromethyl substitution) are preserved through careful reaction condition selection. The simplification occurs in the synthesis pathway, not in the molecular structure, ensuring PGE2 inhibition efficacy is maintained while production becomes more efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11718582B2(R)-4-(1-(1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide)cyclopropyl)-benzoic acid as EP4 receptor antagonist
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 ROTTAPHARM BIOTECH SRL
  • US11718582B2 patent drawing
  • US11718582B2 patent drawing
  • US11718582B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The following invention relates to (R)-4-(1-(1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl) pyrrodiline-2-carboxamide) cyclopropyl benzoic acid (Compound 1) or a salt thereof. Advantageous methods for obtaining the Compound 1 are also described, as well as pharmaceutical compositions containing it (R)-4-(1-(1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)pyrrodiline-2-carboxamide) cyclopropyl benzoic acid (Compound 1) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is described for use as an EP4 receptor antagonist in the treatment of a pathology that involves the activities of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in its pathogenesis.