Low Density EPE Foam Shock Pad for Artificial Turf

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Artificial turf systems face challenges in achieving optimal shock absorption and energy restitution, particularly due to the environmental impact and cost associated with infill materials, and existing shock pads do not consistently provide improved performance over time.

Innovation Solution

A shock pad comprising low density expanded polyethylene (EPE) foam with a density range of 10-100 kg/m³, potentially blended with other polyolefins, offering enhanced shock absorption and energy restitution characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional infill materials (SBR, sand) are used to provide shock resistance, then impact resistance is achieved, but environmental impact increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the shock pad by using low density expanded polyethylene foam with density ranging from 10-100 kg/m³. This parameter change allows the shock pad to provide adequate shock absorption and energy restitution without requiring thick layers of conventional infill materials, thereby reducing environmental impact while maintaining impact resistance performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structure by combining expanded polyethylene foam with specific polymer compositions including polyolefins and other polymers. This composite approach creates a shock pad that delivers improved shock absorption and energy restitution characteristics, reducing the need for conventional infill materials like SBR and sand

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If conventional infill materials are used to provide shock resistance, then impact resistance is achieved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidinfill material quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the density parameter of the foam material to low density (10-100 kg/m³), the shock pad achieves effective shock absorption with reduced material quantity. This eliminates the need for thick layers of expensive conventional infill materials like SBR and sand, thereby reducing overall system cost while maintaining impact resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes porous expanded polyethylene foam structure that provides effective shock absorption through its cellular architecture. This porous structure delivers adequate impact resistance with significantly reduced material quantity compared to conventional dense infill materials, reducing both material cost and installation requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Strength

If existing shock pads are used, then shock absorption is provided, but performance does not consistently improve over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorptionVSAvoidperformance consistency over time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material structure by combining expanded polyethylene foam with specific polymer compositions including polyolefins and other polymers. This composite approach creates a shock pad that delivers improved shock absorption and energy restitution characteristics, reducing the need for conventional infill materials like SBR and sand

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Object-affected harmful factors

If shock pad is used to reduce infill material, then environmental impact decreases, but shock absorption performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidshock absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the shock pad by using low density expanded polyethylene foam with density ranging from 10-100 kg/m³. This parameter change allows the shock pad to provide adequate shock absorption and energy restitution without requiring thick layers of conventional infill materials, thereby reducing environmental impact while maintaining impact resistance performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The low density EPE foam shock pad provides improved shock absorption and energy restitution while reducing the need for infill materials, thereby minimizing environmental impact and maintaining performance over a prolonged period.

Implementation Method 1

A shock pad for artificial turf systems, wherein said shock pad comprises low density expanded polyethylene (EPE) foam with a density range of 10-100 kg/m³, offering enhanced shock absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

The low density EPE foam shock pad provides improved shock absorption and energy restitution while reducing the need for infill materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy restitution: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentEP3885400A1A polymeric foam material for shock pads in artificial grass systems
Publication Date: 2021.09.29 INNOGRAAF BV
  • EP3885400A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3885400A1 patent drawing
  • EP3885400A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a shock pad for artificial turf systems, wherein said shock pad comprises low density expanded polyethylene (EPE). An object of the present invention is to provide a shock pad providing improved shock absorption and/or energy restitution characteristics to artificial turf systems. Another object of the present invention is to provide artificial turf systems having improved shock absorption and/or energy restitution characteristics, especially over a prolonged period of time.