Epicutaneous Allergen Desensitization With Controlled Inflammation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing desensitization methods for allergies, such as subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy, are costly, require medical supervision, have risks, and are less effective for certain allergens, while epicutaneous methods are not widely used due to their invasive nature and lack of standardization.

Innovation Solution

A method involving repeated and controlled application of allergens on the skin to induce a sustained inflammatory response, monitored and adjusted to promote a tolerogenic immune reaction without adjuvants, using devices like occlusive patches to ensure skin contact and reaction observation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy is used, then desensitization effectiveness is improved, but treatment cost and medical supervision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesensitization effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables patients to perform desensitization treatment at home using epicutaneous application of allergens to the skin, eliminating the need for medical professional supervision and specialized injection equipment. The treatment becomes a self-administered process using simple topical application methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the desensitization function from complex medical procedures (subcutaneous injections or sublingual tablets requiring clinical supervision) and implements it through simple epicutaneous allergen application, removing the need for sophisticated delivery systems and professional oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If epicutaneous desensitization is used, then treatment accessibility and ease of use are improved, but standardization and control of inflammatory response are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment accessibilityVSAvoidresponse control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates monitoring of cutaneous inflammatory responses as feedback to adjust treatment parameters. By observing and measuring the inflammatory reaction at the application site, practitioners can standardize the treatment protocol and control the degree of desensitization achieved, ensuring consistency across different patients and treatment stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If conventional immunotherapy methods are used, then immune response modification is improved, but risk of severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response modificationVSAvoidanaphylaxis risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the typically harmful cutaneous inflammatory response into a beneficial therapeutic mechanism. By deliberately inducing controlled local inflammation through epicutaneous allergen application, the treatment harnesses the inflammatory response to drive immune tolerance development, transforming what is usually a sign of allergy into the mechanism of cure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves safe and effective desensitization by gradually converting the immune response to tolerance, reducing cutaneous reactivity and systemic allergic reactions, applicable to various allergens without adjuvants or skin preparation.

Implementation Method 1

using devices like occlusive patches to ensure skin contact and reaction observation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOcclusion:

Data Source

PatentUS12403193B2Allergen desensitization method
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 DBV TECH INC
  • US12403193B2 patent drawing
  • US12403193B2 patent drawing
  • US12403193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application relates to a method for desensitization of allergic patients. More specifically it relates to an epicutaneous desensitization method, applicable to any type of allergens and of patients. The method of the invention is essentially non-invasive and does not require the use of adjuvants. Further, it may be easily applied and monitored by the actual patient.