EPID Self-Calibration for Radiotherapy QA Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiotherapy device quality assurance (QA) methods rely on third-party devices, which introduce inaccuracies in measurement results due to geometric deformation and position offsets of the electronic portal imaging device (EPID), affecting the accuracy of QA for radiotherapy devices.

Innovation Solution

A QA method and device that utilize an image sequence acquired by the EPID, including correction and portal images, to determine calibration parameters and accurately analyze the state of QA objects, thereby calibrating the EPID in real-time to remove the impact of position changes and geometric deformation, ensuring precise QA results without the need for third-party devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If third-party devices are used for QA measurement, then the QA process can be performed, but the measurement accuracy deteriorates due to geometric deformation and position offsets of the EPID

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQA measurement accuracyVSAvoidgeometric deformation and position offsets
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The EPID performs self-calibration by capturing correction images and processing them through the calibration module to generate calibration parameters. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external third-party devices and compensates for geometric deformation and position offsets using the EPID's own measurement data and image processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the EPID to capture correction images, processing these images to obtain calibration parameters, and then applying these parameters to correct subsequent portal images. This closed-loop feedback mechanism continuously compensates for geometric deformation and position offsets, improving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If third-party devices are introduced for QA, then the QA function can be achieved, but the QA accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQA function reliabilityVSAvoidQA accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The EPID performs self-calibration by capturing correction images and processing them through the calibration module to generate calibration parameters. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external third-party devices and compensates for geometric deformation and position offsets using the EPID's own measurement data and image processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration parameters act as an intermediary that mediates between the EPID's raw measurements and the final QA results. These parameters transform the uncalibrated portal images into calibrated images, eliminating the need for third-party devices while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If real-time calibration is performed, then the impact of position changes and geometric deformation is removed, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQA accuracyVSAvoidcalibration processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration by capturing correction images and generating calibration parameters in advance. These pre-computed calibration parameters are then applied to subsequent portal images, avoiding the need for time-consuming real-time calibration calculations during the actual QA measurement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration parameters serve as a computational copy that encapsulates the complex geometric deformation and position offset information. By using this compressed representation rather than performing full geometric corrections in real-time, the system achieves high accuracy with reduced processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240316364A1Quality assurance method for radiotherapy device, computer device, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE
  • US20240316364A1 patent drawing
  • US20240316364A1 patent drawing
  • US20240316364A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A quality assurance (QA) method for a radiotherapy device, a QA device for a radiotherapy device, and a computer device. The radiotherapy device includes an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). The QA method for the radiotherapy device includes: obtaining an image sequence based on acquirement of EPID, the image sequence comprising one or more correction images for correcting the EPID, and one or more portal images for a QA object; and determining a QA result of the QA object of the radiotherapy device according to a calibration parameter corresponding to the one or more correction images and according to the one or more portal images.