Epitaxial Silicon Wafer Deposition via Cross-Flow and Mini-Batch Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The crystalline silicon photovoltaic industry faces high manufacturing costs due to polysilicon production, crystal growth, and wafering processes, which limit cost reductions and hinder the achievement of unsubsidized grid parity, as these steps are capital-intensive and require significant infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

The development of a direct-epitaxial deposition method for producing monocrystalline silicon wafers from the gas phase, bypassing polysilicon production and wafering, using a system with multiple mini-batch reactors, a substrate carrier with low heat capacity and high emissivity, and cross-flow deposition to enhance throughput and reduce costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional polysilicon production, crystal growth, and wafering processes are used, then high-quality monocrystalline silicon wafers can be produced, but manufacturing costs are high due to capital-intensive infrastructure requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the polysilicon production and wafering steps from the conventional manufacturing process. By using direct epitaxial deposition, the process obtains monocrystalline silicon wafers without requiring polysilicon purification, crystal growth furnaces, or wire sawing equipment, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining wafer quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical wafering process (wire sawing) with a chemical deposition process. Instead of mechanically cutting wafers from ingots, the method uses chemical vapor deposition to directly form silicon wafers on substrates, eliminating the need for mechanical cutting equipment and associated infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Quantity of substance

If conventional wafering processes are used, then silicon wafers can be produced, but silicon usage is inefficient with high kerf losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesilicon usage efficiencyVSAvoidkerf loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical cutting with chemical deposition. By directly depositing silicon onto substrates to form wafers, the process eliminates kerf loss entirely since no material is removed through cutting. The silicon is deposited only where needed on the substrate surface, achieving near 100% silicon usage efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of wafer production from subtractive (cutting) to additive (deposition). This parameter change transforms the material efficiency from typically 70-80% in conventional processes to over 95% in the epitaxial process, as silicon is deposited only on the required wafer areas without generating kerf waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If thin film processes are used, then manufacturing costs may be reduced, but cell efficiencies are substantially less than crystalline silicon

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcell efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the crystalline structure parameter by producing monocrystalline silicon through epitaxial deposition rather than amorphous or polycrystalline thin films. This parameter change maintains the high efficiency characteristics of single-crystal silicon while adopting the cost advantages of thin-film processing methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite approach by combining the high-efficiency monocrystalline silicon material with the cost-effective thin-film deposition process. The resulting product achieves both high cell efficiency (comparable to conventional crystalline silicon) and reduced manufacturing costs (approaching thin-film cost levels)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Manufacturing precision

If conventional crystal growth processes are used, then monocrystalline silicon can be produced, but the process is capital-intensive and requires significant infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonocrystalline qualityVSAvoidinfrastructure requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the monocrystalline silicon production step from the conventional sequence that requires polysilicon production and crystal growth. By using direct epitaxial deposition, the method produces monocrystalline wafers in a single step without requiring expensive crystal growth furnaces or polysilicon purification infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a substrate as a template or copy upon which to deposit the silicon layer. The substrate provides the crystalline structure that is copied and extended during epitaxial growth, eliminating the need for separate crystal growth steps while maintaining monocrystalline quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces silicon usage and production costs, enabling manufacturing costs to approach grid parity for high-efficiency PV modules by eliminating the need for polysilicon and wafering, while maintaining high wafer quality and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

epitaxial deposition of silicon wafers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxial deposition: Epitaxy

Implementation Method 2

direct-epitaxial deposition method for producing monocrystalline silicon wafers from the gas phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 3

substrate carrier with low heat capacity and high emissivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 4

cross-flow deposition to enhance throughput and reduce costs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS9982363B2Silicon wafers by epitaxial deposition
Publication Date: 2018.05.29 SVAGOS TECHNIK INC
  • US9982363B2 patent drawing
  • US9982363B2 patent drawing
  • US9982363B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for depositing thin single crystal silicon wafers by epitaxial deposition in a silicon precursor depletion mode with cross-flow deposition may include: a substrate carrier with low total heat capacity, high emissivity and small volume; a lamp module with rapid heat-up, efficient heat production, and spatial control over heating; and a manifold designed for cross-flow processing. Furthermore, the substrate carrier may include heat reflectors to control heat loss from the edges of the carrier and/or heat chokes to thermally isolate the carrier from the manifolds, allowing independent temperature control of the manifolds. The carrier and substrates may be configured for deposition on both sides of the substrates—the substrates having release layers on both sides and the carriers being configured to have equal process gas flow over both surfaces of the substrate. High volume may be addressed by a deposition system comprising multiple mini-batch reactors.