Epitope Prediction Model Using Logistic Regression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current epitope prediction methods are limited by their reliance on allele-specific or supertype-specific classifiers, which restrict information sharing across similar alleles or supertypes, and are often based on small sample sizes, leading to suboptimal predictions and dependence on untested supertype definitions.

Innovation Solution

The approach leverages information across multiple HLA alleles and supertypes using a logistic regression model with additional features such as amino acid properties and binding energies, employing hidden variables and shift variables to improve predictive accuracy and generate probabilistic epitope predictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If allele-specific or supertype-specific classifiers are used for epitope prediction, then the model can be trained on focused datasets, but information sharing across similar alleles or supertypes is restricted and sample sizes remain small

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsample size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple allele-specific or supertype-specific classifiers into a unified model that shares information across similar alleles. This merging allows the system to leverage data from multiple related alleles simultaneously, effectively increasing the sample size available for training while maintaining the ability to make allele-specific predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified model serves multiple functions by simultaneously handling predictions for multiple alleles and supertypes. It can operate in different modes: making predictions for specific alleles, aggregating information across supertypes, or combining both approaches, thereby providing universal applicability across different prediction scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If traditional allele-specific classifiers are used, then the model structure is simple, but predictive accuracy is suboptimal due to limited information sharing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified model is segmented into distinct components that handle different aspects of prediction: allele-specific features, supertype features, and their interactions. This segmentation allows the complex model to be built systematically from manageable parts while enabling information sharing across different levels of abstraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to the prediction model by incorporating supertype-level information in addition to allele-specific information. This dimensional expansion allows the model to capture patterns that exist across multiple alleles while still maintaining allele-specific resolution, thereby improving accuracy without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of information

If supertype definitions are used to group alleles, then information can be shared across similar alleles, but the predictions depend on untested supertype definitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation sharingVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The model incorporates feedback mechanisms that allow it to learn from prediction outcomes and adjust its use of supertype definitions. By continuously evaluating prediction performance and refining supertype groupings based on actual data patterns, the system reduces dependence on arbitrary or untested supertype definitions while maintaining information sharing benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent treats supertype definitions as adjustable parameters rather than fixed categories. The model can modify supertype groupings and their weightings based on the data being analyzed, allowing flexible adaptation to different datasets and reducing reliance on predetermined, potentially inaccurate supertype classifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8121797B2T-cell epitope prediction
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 ZHIGU HLDG
  • US8121797B2 patent drawing
  • US8121797B2 patent drawing
  • US8121797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Epitope prediction models are described herein. By way of example, a system for predicting epitope information relating to a epitope can include a classification model (e.g., logistic regression model). The trained classification model can illustratively operatively execute one ore logistic functions on received protein data, and incorporate one or more of hidden binary variables and shift variables that when processed represent the identification (e.g., prediction) of one or more desired epitopes. The classification model can be configured to predict the epitope information by processing data including various features of an epitope, MHC, MHC supertype, and Boolean combinations thereof.