EPS Steering Diagnostics Using Torque Response Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing diagnostic methods for vehicle steering systems are inadequate in identifying issues that are not readily identifiable through trouble codes or noticeable symptoms, leading to inaccurate diagnoses and unnecessary part replacements.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic system that controls an electronic power steering (EPS) gear to apply a predetermined torque profile, monitors the system's response, and uses machine learning models to identify components causing performance issues by correlating deviations from expected responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional diagnostic methods using trouble codes and symptom observation are used, then the diagnostic process is simple and quick, but the diagnostic accuracy is low and many issues cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic actions by automatically executing standardized test sequences that apply predetermined torque profiles to the steering system before a final diagnosis is made. This preliminary testing phase captures baseline performance data that is then compared against expected responses, enabling accurate identification of deviations without requiring complex manual inspection procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary diagnostic layer that sits between traditional symptom-based diagnosis and the actual steering system components. This intermediary layer uses machine learning models and expected response databases to mediate between raw sensor data and component-level diagnoses, translating complex measurements into actionable diagnostic information without requiring direct complex interaction with each steering component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive testing of steering system components is performed, then diagnostic accuracy improves, but the time required for diagnostics increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system employs periodic action by executing tests at standardized intervals and using periodic torque profiles that systematically vary test parameters. This structured periodic approach ensures comprehensive coverage of steering system responses under different operating conditions while maintaining efficient test execution through automation and pre-programmed test sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters efficiently by using predetermined torque profiles that systematically vary torque magnitude, direction, and timing parameters. These parameter changes are pre-optimized to capture the most diagnostic information in the shortest time, allowing comprehensive component testing without linearly increasing diagnostic time. The machine learning models also adapt parameter selection based on learned patterns from previous diagnostics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If manual inspection and trial-and-error diagnostic methods are used, then equipment cost is low, but unnecessary part replacements occur and repair efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair efficiencyVSAvoiddiagnostic information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing actual steering system responses during testing against expected responses stored in the database. This feedback mechanism identifies specific deviations and traces them to particular components, providing actionable diagnostic information that eliminates guesswork. The feedback loop also learns from accumulated diagnostic data, continuously improving the accuracy of expected response predictions and reducing false positives that lead to unnecessary part replacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12534125B2Vehicle steering system diagnostics tool
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORP
  • US12534125B2 patent drawing
  • US12534125B2 patent drawing
  • US12534125B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for performing diagnostics on a steering system of a vehicle includes controlling an electronic power steering (EPS) gear of the steering system to apply force to the steering system in accordance with a predetermined torque profile, receiving signals corresponding to a measured response of the steering system caused by the predetermined torque profile, comparing the received signals to an expected response of the steering system, and generating an output that includes a diagnosis of the steering system based on the comparison between the received signals and the expected response of the steering system.