Equipment Behavior Profiling for Low-False-Positive Maintenance Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for managing equipment in buildings are inadequate in predicting failures and optimizing operations due to misidentification of equipment behavior, leading to late or non-comprehensive repairs, increased maintenance costs, and reactive maintenance approaches with high false positives.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a classification module, profiling module, and insights and service actionable generation module that behaviorally classifies equipment, generates time-granular behavior patterns, and provides proactive insights and recommendations for maintenance, enabling early detection of anomalies and reducing redundant processing through reusable classifications and autonomous editing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional alarm-based FDD solutions are used to identify equipment problems, then fault detection capability is provided, but false positives increase and real failure reasons are not identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments equipment behavior analysis into multiple independent behavior models, each focusing on specific aspects such as temperature behavior, pressure behavior, vibration behavior, etc. This segmentation allows precise analysis of individual behavior patterns without interference from other factors, reducing false positives while maintaining comprehensive fault detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms traditional threshold-based alarm parameters into behavior-based parameters that capture temporal patterns and relationships. By changing from static threshold comparisons to dynamic behavior pattern recognition, the system achieves more accurate fault detection with reduced false positives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive equipment behavior analysis is performed to identify all possible failure reasons, then prediction accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides complex equipment behavior analysis into multiple independent behavior models, each analyzing specific aspects of equipment operation. This segmentation reduces the computational complexity of each individual model while collectively achieving comprehensive and accurate fault prediction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates universal behavior models that can be applied across different equipment types and failure modes. These multi-functional models reduce overall system complexity by avoiding the need to build separate specialized models for each specific failure scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of repair

If traditional reactive maintenance is performed after equipment failure, then maintenance cost is reduced, but equipment downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance costVSAvoidequipment downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting and analyzing equipment behavior patterns that precede actual failures. By identifying degradation trends and predicting failures before they occur, the system enables proactive maintenance scheduling that prevents unexpected downtime while optimizing maintenance cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11438434B2System and a method for generating service actionable for equipment
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 CARRIER CORP
  • US11438434B2 patent drawing
  • US11438434B2 patent drawing
  • US11438434B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the invention are directed towards a system and a method for generating service actionable for a plurality of equipment. Embodiments of the invention describe the method comprises steps of behaviorally classifying an equipment into normalizing classification and behavior classification. The method further comprises steps of processing the normalizing and behavior classifications to generate one or more profiles corresponding to the equipment. The one or more profiles represent time-granular behavior patterns of the equipment. The method comprises steps of generating time-granular normalized characteristics for the equipment and normalizing variances of the time-granular normalized characteristics and the time-granular behavior patterns to generate possible service actionable (SACT) recommendations that are integrated into workflows to drive action and receive prediction confirmation.