Automatic control method of generating sub-systems and sub-system arbitration from the deconstruction of a complex equipment graph

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current building automation systems face challenges in automatically discovering and understanding the equipment available and how they can be utilized for efficient control, particularly in managing complex building systems like HVAC, energy, and lighting.

Innovation Solution

A method for automatically decomposing a complex graph of connected equipment into sub-systems, enabling automatic labeling, prioritization, and classification of sub-systems into synchronous and asynchronous groups, and reducing the control state space through semantic labeling and decomposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If building automation systems attempt to automatically discover and understand complex equipment connections, then the level of automation increases, but the complexity of the system and difficulty of detection worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic discovery and understanding of equipmentVSAvoidcomplexity of building systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex building automation system into distinct functional modules including equipment discovery module, graph construction module, decomposition module, and control scheme generation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the automation process, breaking down the overwhelming complexity into manageable segments that can be processed independently and systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an equipment graph as an intermediary data structure that mediates between the physical building equipment and the control system. This graph serves as a standardized representation layer that simplifies the complexity by providing a unified model for equipment connections, relationships, and interactions, making the system more tractable for automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system decomposes complex equipment graphs into sub-systems, then the ease of operation improves, but the computational processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement of control schemesVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary decomposition of the equipment graph into sub-systems and generates control schemes in advance, before actual building operations begin. By pre-processing the complex graph structure and pre-generating control strategies, the system reduces real-time computational requirements and enables faster response during actual operation, thus reducing time loss during critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the large equipment graph into smaller, more manageable sub-systems that can be processed independently. This segmentation reduces the computational burden on any single processing operation while maintaining the overall system's ease of operation, as each sub-system can be managed and controlled separately with reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the system reduces the search space through decomposition, then the productivity improves, but the manufacturing precision of control schemes may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneration of control schemesVSAvoidaccuracy of control schemes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sub-system control schemes into a comprehensive building-wide control strategy. By combining the decomposed sub-systems back into an integrated control framework, the system maintains precision while benefiting from the productivity gains of decomposition. The merging process ensures that control accuracy is preserved through coordinated interaction of sub-system controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the dimension of hierarchical organization to the control scheme generation process. Instead of treating all equipment at a single level, the system operates across multiple dimensions - decomposing into sub-systems for efficient processing, then re-integrating with awareness of hierarchical relationships. This dimensional approach allows productivity improvement through decomposition while maintaining precision through hierarchical context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12388673B2Automatic control method of generating sub-systems and sub-system arbitration from the deconstruction of a complex equipment graph
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 PASSIVELOGIC INC
  • US12388673B2 patent drawing
  • US12388673B2 patent drawing
  • US12388673B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for organizing automatic control in automation systems from a system description, using deconstruction of complex equipment graphs. A system control scheme is automatically generated from a deconstruction of an equipment graph into controllable sets of prioritized sub-systems. An equipment graph comprises one or more subsystems of equipment. Prioritized sub-systems comprise a unique routing path through an equipment graph. Prioritized sub-systems comprise the ability to be actuated and are divided into groups of sub-system sets. Groups of sub-system sets comprise synchronous and asynchronous sets and are created for conjoined routing paths of parallel sub-systems.