Automatic control method of generating sub-systems and sub-system arbitration from the deconstruction of a complex equipment graph

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current building automation systems face challenges in automatically discovering and understanding the equipment and connections within complex building systems, making it difficult to automate control and optimization of systems like HVAC, energy, and lighting.

Innovation Solution

A method to automatically decompose a graph representing building equipment into sub-systems, enabling semantic labeling and automatic control, prioritization, and classification of sub-systems into synchronous and asynchronous groups, reducing the state space complexity and facilitating efficient system control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automatic discovery methods are used to understand equipment and connections in building systems, then the extent of automation is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring complex system relationships worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of equipment discoveryVSAvoiddifficulty of understanding system relationships
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex building automation system into discrete equipment entities and their relationships, representing them as a graph structure where equipment are nodes and connections are edges. This segmentation transforms the undetectable complex system into analyzable discrete components that can be automatically processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary graph representation layer between the physical equipment and the control system. This graph serves as a mediator that captures system relationships in a structured format, enabling automatic discovery and understanding without requiring direct complex analysis of equipment interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the building automation system accounts for all equipment relationships and simultaneous operation constraints, then the reliability of system control is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem control reliabilityVSAvoidsystem modeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-analyzing equipment relationships and constraints during system setup, storing this information in the graph structure. This preliminary processing captures all relationships upfront, allowing the control system to make reliable decisions without re-analyzing complex relationships during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the representation parameters from detailed equipment specifications to abstract graph elements (nodes, edges, relationships). This parameter transformation simplifies the model while preserving essential control-relevant information, reducing complexity without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system searches through all possible control paths in complex equipment graphs, then the completeness of control solutions is improved, but the loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of control solutionsVSAvoidcontrol path search time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control path search problem by maintaining the graph structure throughout analysis, allowing decomposition of the search space into manageable sub-problems based on equipment relationships. This segmentation enables efficient exploration without exhaustive search of all possible paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by searching only through relevant control paths identified through graph analysis, rather than exhaustively searching all possible paths. The graph structure enables identification and pruning of irrelevant paths, achieving sufficient completeness without excessive time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10708078B2Automatic control method of generating sub-systems and sub-system arbitration from the deconstruction of a complex equipment graph
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 PASSIVELOGIC INC
  • US10708078B2 patent drawing
  • US10708078B2 patent drawing
  • US10708078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for organizing automatic control in automation systems from a system description, using deconstruction of complex equipment graphs. A system control scheme is automatically generated from a deconstruction of an equipment graph into controllable sets of prioritized sub-systems. An equipment graph comprises one or more subsystems of equipment. Prioritized sub-systems comprise a unique routing path through an equipment graph. Prioritized sub-systems comprise the ability to be actuated and are divided into groups of sub-system sets. Groups of sub-system sets comprise synchronous and asynchronous sets and are created for conjoined routing paths of parallel sub-systems.